The inner cathedral: Mental architecture in high scholasticism

Vivarium 46 (3):253-274 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mediaeval psychological theory was a “faculty psychology”: a confederation of semiautonomous sub-personal agents, the interaction of which constitutes our psychological experience. One such faculty was intellective appetite, that is, the will. On what grounds was the will taken to be a distinct faculty? After a brief survey of Aristotle's criteria for identifying and distinguishing mental faculties, I look in some detail at the mainstream mediaeval view, given clear expression by Thomas Aquinas, and then at the dissenting views of John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham. I conclude with some reflections on why the mainstream mediaeval view was discarded by Descartes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of the Mind.Marleen Rozemond - 2006 - In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Descartes' Meditations. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 48--66.
The architecture of Lincoln Cathedral and the institution of justice.John Hendrix - 2013 - In Jonathan Simon, Nicholas Temple & Renee Tobe (eds.), Architecture and Justice: Judicial Meanings in the Public Realm. pp. 257-266.
Linguistic Apprehension as Incidental Sensation in Thomas Aquinas.Daniel D. De Haan - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:179-196.
Narrative, expression and mental substance.Anthony Rudd - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (5):413-435.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
167 (#112,088)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter R. King
Nottingham University (PhD)

References found in this work

Thomas Aquinas on the will as rational appetite.David M. Gallagher - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (4):559-584.

Add more references