Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 139 (3):421 - 428 (2004)
|Abstract||Murray MacBeath, in his essay ``Time's Square'', describes a fictitious scenariowhere various physical observations made by the participants would, he claims, invitethe interpretation that time for them is two-dimensional. In the present paper, however, Iargue that such observations come close to underdetermining the hypothesis of time's twodimensionality;for a rival hypothesis - that, under certain circumstances, the observationscan be explained in terms of the familiar time dilation effects predicted by special relativity- almost fits the evidence as well. That is, under certain (albeit artificial) circumstances theworld can already behave almost as though it were temporally two-dimensional.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Yuri Balashov (2000). Persistence and Space-Time. The Monist 83 (3):321-340.
John Earman (1967). On Going Backward in Time. Philosophy of Science 34 (3):211-222.
Joel Hunter, Time Travel. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mariela Szirko, Why is Time Frame-Dependent in Relativity? Minkowski's Spacetime as a Kantian 'Condition of Possibility' for Relativistic Calculations.
Nicholas Maxwell (2006). Special Relativity, Time, Probabilism, and Ultimate Reality. In D. Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime. Elsevier, B. V.
Yuri Balashov & Michel Janssen (2003). Presentism and Relativity. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):327-346.
Scott Mann (2006). Space, Time and Natural Kinds. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):290-322.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,300 of 739,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,337 of 739,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?