Killing baby suzy
Philosophical Studies 139 (3):343 - 352 (2008)
| Abstract | In her (1996) Kadri Vihvelin argues that autoinfanticide is nomologically impossible and so that there is no sense in which time travelers are able to commit it. In response, Theodore Sider (2002) defends the original Lewisian verdict (Lewis 1976) whereby, on a common understanding of ability, time travelers are able to kill their earlier selves and their failure to do so is merely coincidental. This paper constitutes a critical note on arguments put forward by both Sider and Vihvelin. I argue that although Sider’s criticism starts out promisingly he doesn’t succeed in establishing that Vihvelin’s analysis fails, because (a) he neglects to rule out a class of counterfactuals to which Vihvelin’s sample-case may belong; and (b) (together with Lewis) he is wrong to suggest that future facts are irrelevant in the evaluation of time travelers’ abilities. I show instead that Vihvelin’s argument is viciously circular, indicating that even if there are nomological constraints on autoinfanticide these cannot be established a priori. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKadri Vihvelin (1994). Stop Me Before I Kill Again. Philosophical Studies 75 (1-2):115-148.
Kadri Vihvelin (1995). Reply to 'Causes and Nested Counterfactuals'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (4):579 – 581.
Peter B. M. Vranas (2009). Can I Kill My Younger Self? Time Travel and the Retrosuicide Paradox. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):520-534.
By Ishtiyaque Haji (2008). Dispositional Compatibilism and Frankfurt-Type Examples. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2):226–241.
Jennifer McKitrick (forthcoming). Response to Kadri Vihvelin's “Counterfactuals and Dispositions”. Philosophical Studies.
Michael McKenna (2010). Whose Argumentative Burden, Which Incompatibilist Arguments?—Getting the Dialectic Right. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):429-443.
Kadri Vihvelin (1996). What Time Travelers Cannot Do. Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):315 - 330.
Theodore Sider (2002). Time Travel, Coincidences and Counterfactuals. Philosophical Studies 110 (2):115 - 138.
Peter B. M. Vranas (forthcoming). What Time Travelers May Be Able to Do. Philosophical Studies.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads76 ( #10,629 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,790 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
