Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms
| Abstract | Paradigms that combine synthetic (one-word) and periphrastic forms in complementary distribution have loomed large in discussions of morphological blocking (McCloskey and Hale 1983, Poser 1986, Andrews 1990). Such composite paradigms potentially challenge the lexicalist claim that words and sentences are organized by distinct subsystems of grammar. They are of course grist for the mill of Distributed Morphology, a theory which revels in every kind of interpenetration of morphology and syntax. But they have prompted even Paradigm Function Morphologists to introduce syntactic constructions into their morphology. I shall argue, instead, for a lexicalist treatment, which is based on the idea that blocking is a filtering device that applies to the output of the generative system, rather than operating directly on its derivations (Wunderlich 1996). I present this approach to blocking in section 1, and show in section 2 how it deals with the intricate composite verb paradigm of Latin, where the periphrastic perfect passive supplies the missing pieces of an otherwise synthetic inflectional system. This part of Latin verb morphology has recently been treated from the perspective of Distributed Morphology and Paradigm Function Morphology. I compare my solution to these treatments and argue that it is superior in two respects: it predicts the complementarity of the synthetic and periphrastic formations and yet allows their respective morphological and syntactic properties to be captured, and it readily covers some basic data that the other analyses get wrong. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesDirk P. Janssen (1999). The Place of Analogy in Minimalist Morphology and the Irregularity of Regular Forms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1025-1026.
Anton Benz (2006). Partial Blocking and Associative Learning. Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (5):587 - 615.
Jacob L. Dubbeldam (2007). An Annotated Bibliography of C.J. Van der Klaauw with Notes on the Impact of His Work. Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1).
Robert Kaspar (1977). Der Typus — Idee Und Realität. Acta Biotheoretica 26 (3).
Albert R. Jonsen (1991). Casuistry as Methodology in Clinical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).
Bernard Jeune, Denis Barabé & Christian Lacroix (2006). Classical and Dynamic Morphology: Toward a Synthesis Through the Space of Forms. Acta Biotheoretica 54 (4).
J. E. Miller (1985). Semantics and Syntax: Parallels and Connections. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-22Total downloads3 ( #203,804 of 556,774 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
