David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 1 (7):112-115 (2009)
It is difficult to define perspective within sets that are self belonging. For example in the study of mankind, anthropology, both men and their studies fall into the same category that contains the topic outline. This situation entails a universal quality of uniqueness, an instance of it, to the topic of anthropology that may be viewed in parallel with the topic of nature as the set of unique particulars. Yet one might assent to the notion in the inclusive study of man, anthropology, that nothing in its’ content should conceivably be construed to exceed it, though in approaches to the topic, reference to the topic of nature, unavoided, refer to the scientific topic of nature in which contemporary notions, when contrasted, exceed the perceptual experience of nature. In this presentation problems in approaches and in the application of available tools for analysis to the study of man will be discussed. Framed with respect to a concept of parallelism, notions and stimuli are introduced to augment and reorient towards a more creative perspective with respect to the organization of first perspective considerations in studies. The theories of relativity, the idea of mathematical relations for simultaneous events, the presence of artifactual paradoxes as they are reflected in thinking and the scientific tools applied towards investigations are discussed and hopefully highlighted so that they may hopefully be perceived distinctly form realities involved in the pursuit of studies.
|Keywords||logical positivism mechanism theory of relativity parallelism anthropology universals and constants individual in anthropology impulse and anthropology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ursula Rao, John Hutnyk & Klaus-Peter Köpping (eds.) (2005). Celebrating Transgression: Method and Politics in Anthropological Studies of Culture: A Book in Honour of Klaus Peter Köpping. Berghahn Books.
Christian Lotz (2005). From Nature to Culture? Diogenes and Philosophical Anthropology. Human Studies 28 (1):41 - 56.
John S. Henderson & Patricia Netherly (eds.) (1993). Configurations of Power: Holistic Anthropology in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press.
Patrick R. Frierson (2006). Character and Evil in Kant's Moral Anthropology. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (4):623-634.
E. Paul Durrenberger & Suzan Erem (eds.) (2010). Paradigm for Anthropology: An Ethnographic Reader. Paradigm Publishers.
Simon Coleman & Peter Collins (eds.) (2011). Dislocating Anthropology?: Bases of Longing and Belonging in the Analysis of Contemporary Societies. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
John A. Rush (1996). Clinical Anthropology: An Application of Anthropological Concepts Within Clinical Settings. Praeger.
Neni Panourgiá & George E. Marcus (eds.) (2008). Ethnographica Moralia: Experiments in Interpretive Anthropology. Fordham University Press.
Added to index2009-04-21
Total downloads26 ( #70,286 of 1,099,911 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,017 of 1,099,911 )
How can I increase my downloads?