Proportionality in Sentencing and the Restorative Justice Paradigm: 'Just Deserts' for Victims and Defendants Alike? [Book Review]

Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):197-213 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The doctrine of proportionality seeks to limit arbitrary and capricious punishment in order to ensure that offenders are punished according to their ‘just desert’. In Australian sentencing law, proportionality goes some way toward achieving this ‘balanced’ approach by requiring a court to consider various and often competing interests in formulating a sentence commensurate with offence seriousness and offender culpability. Modification of sentencing law by the introduction of victim impact statements or the requirement that sentencing courts take explicit account of the harm done to the victim and community has generated debate, however, as to the extent to which offenders may be now subject to unjustified, harsher punishments. This article proposes that in order to overcome the controversy of the modification of offender and victim rights in sentencing, sentencing courts adhere to a doctrine of proportionality that is explicitly sensitive to the needs of victims and offenders in a model of restorative justice that focuses on the consequences of crime as against the individual, rather than the state. The extent to which proportionality, as the current constitutive principle of Australian sentencing law, may be modified to better encourage a dialogue between victim and offender is discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of sentencing white-collar criminals.Phillip Balsmeier & Jennifer Kelly - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):143 - 152.
Sentencing: Must justice be even-handed? [REVIEW]Michael Davis - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):77 - 117.
Why Should Remorse be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing?Steven Keith Tudor - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):241-257.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
The Subjective Experience of Punishment.Adam J. Kolber - 2009 - Columbia Law Review 109:182.
The constitutional structure of proportionality.Matthias Klatt - 2012 - Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Moritz Meister.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
60 (#239,890)

6 months
3 (#439,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?