Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):741-741 (2004)
|Abstract||Atran & Norenzayan (A&N) are correct that religion is an evolutionary by-product, not an adaptation, but they do not go far enough. Once supernatural beliefs are enabled by processes they describe, numerous social-cognitive mechanisms related to attachment, social exchange, coalitional psychology, status and dominance, and kinship are crucial for explaining the specific forms religion takes and individual and cultural differences therein.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Todd K. Shackelford & Robin R. Vallacher (2004). From Disorder to Coherence in Social Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):356-356.
Paul E. Griffiths & John S. Wilkins (forthcoming). When Do Evolutionary Explanations of Belief Debunk Belief? In Darwin in the 21st Century.
Craig T. Palmer, Lyle B. Steadman, Chris Cassidy & Kathryn Coe (2008). Totemism, Metaphor and Tradition: Incorporating Cultural Traditions Into Evolutionary Psychology Explanations of Religion. Zygon 43 (3):719-735.
Sefa Hayibor (2009). Evolutionary Psychology and Business Ethics Research. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4):587-616.
Gregory R. Peterson (2010). Are Evolutionary/Cognitive Theories of Religion Relevant for Philosophy of Religion? Zygon 45 (3):545-557.
Scott Atran & Ara Norenzayan (2004). Religion's Evolutionary Landscape: Counterintuition, Commitment, Compassion, Communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):713-730.
Scott Atran & Ara Norenzayan (2004). Why Minds Create Gods: Devotion, Deception, Death, and Arational Decision Making. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):754-770.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #52,469 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?