David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 139 (1):73-89 (2008)
If zombies were conceivable in the sense relevant to the ‘conceivability argument’ against physicalism, a certain epiphenomenalistic conception of consciousness—the ‘e-qualia story’—would also be conceivable. But the e-qualia story is not conceivable because it involves a contradiction. The non-physical ‘e-qualia’ supposedly involved could not perform cognitive processing, which would therefore have to be performed by physical processes; and these could not put anyone into ‘epistemic contact’ with e-qualia, contrary to the e-qualia story. Interactionism does not enable zombists to escape these conclusions
|Keywords||Zombies Consciousness Epiphenomenalism Physicalism Conceivability Conceivability argument Qualia Mental causation Privacy Chalmers|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilbert Ryle (1949/2002). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson and Co.
Saul A. Kripke (1980/1998). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
David J. Chalmers (2002). Does Conceivability Entail Possibility? In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press 145--200.
Saul Kripke (2010). Naming and Necessity. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge 431-433.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brent Silby (1998). On The Conceivability of Zombies. In Jack Copeland (ed.), Philosophy research paper series - Dept Philosophy, University of Canterbury.
Luca Malatesti (2013). Zombies, the Uniformity of Nature, and Contingent Physicalism: A Sympathetic Response to Boran Berčić. Prolegomena 12 (2):245-259.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2008). Access Denied to Zombies. Unpublished:1-13.
Daniel Giberman (2015). Is Mereology a Guide to Conceivability? Mind 124 (493):121-146.
Torin Alter (2007). Imagining Subjective Absence: Marcus on Zombies. Disputatio 2 (22):91-101.
Jacek Jarocki (2013). David Chalmers’ Argument for the Logical Possibility of Zombies. Roczniki Filozoficzne 61 (1):23-42.
Heimir Geirsson (2014). Conceivability and Coherence: A Skeptical View of Zombies. Erkenntnis 79 (1):211-225.
Paul G. Skokowski (2002). I, Zombie. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (1):1-9.
Karol Polcyn (2006). Conceivability, Possibility, and a Posteriori Necessity: On Chalmers' Argument for Dualism. Diametros 7 (March):37-55.
Casey Woodling (2014). Imagining Zombies. Disputatio 6 (38):107-116.
Moti Mizrahi (2013). Why the Argument From Zombies Against Physicalism is Question-Begging. The Reasoner 7 (8):94-95.
Woojin Han (2014). Can the Conditional Analysis Strategy Help Physicalism? Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (1-2):110-126.
Andrew Melnyk (2001). Physicalism Unfalsified: Chalmers' Inconclusive Argument for Dualism. In Carl Gillett & Barry M. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press 331-349.
Katalin Balog (1998). Conceivability Arguments. Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads187 ( #15,144 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #42,091 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?