Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):381 - 394 (2007)
Recent, well-publicized scandals, involving unethical conduct have rekindled interest in academic misconduct. Prior studies of academic misconduct have focussed exclusively on situational factors (e.g., integrity culture, honor codes), demographic variables or personality constructs. We contend that it is important to also examine how␣these classes of variables interact to influence perceptions of and intentions relating to academic misconduct. In a sample of 217 business students, we examined how integrity culture interacts with Prudence and Adjustment to explain variance in estimated frequency of cheating, suspicions of cheating, considering cheating and reporting cheating. Age, integrity culture, and personality variables were significantly related to different criteria. Overall, personality variables explained the most unique variance in academic misconduct, and Adjustment interacted with integrity culture, such that integrity culture had more influence on intentions to cheat for less well-adjusted individuals. Implications for practice are discussed and future research directions are offered.
|Keywords||academic integrity academic culture cheating misconduct personality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark G. Simkin & Alexander McLeod (2010). Why Do College Students Cheat? Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3):441 - 453.
Rafik Z. Elias (2009). The Impact of Anti-Intellectualism Attitudes and Academic Self-Efficacy on Business Students' Perceptions of Cheating. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):199 - 209.
Mark Baetz, Lucia Zivcakova, Eileen Wood, Amanda Nosko, Domenica de Pasquale & Karin Archer (2011). Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts. Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):217-234.
Yuchao Ma, Donald L. McCabe & Ruizhi Liu (2013). Students' Academic Cheating in Chinese Universities: Prevalence, Influencing Factors, and Proposed Action. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):169-184.
Jeffrey A. Roberts & David M. Wasieleski (2012). Moral Reasoning in Computer-Based Task Environments: Exploring the Interplay Between Cognitive and Technological Factors on Individuals' Propensity to Break Rules. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 110 (3):355-376.
Similar books and articles
S. A. Stearns (2001). The Student-Instructor Relationship's Effect on Academic Integrity. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):275 – 285.
Nicole Andreoli & Joel Lefkowitz (2009). Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Misconduct in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):309 - 332.
Daniel E. Martin, Asha Rao & Lloyd R. Sloan (2009). Plagiarism, Integrity, and Workplace Deviance: A Criterion Study. Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):36 – 50.
Vivien K. G. Lim & Sean K. B. See (2001). Attitudes Toward, and Intentions to Report, Academic Cheating Among Students in Singapore. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):261 – 274.
Bernard E. Whitley & Patricia Keith-Spiegel (2001). Academic Integrity as an Institutional Issue. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):325 – 342.
Soheila Mirshekary & Ann D. K. Lawrence (2009). Academic and Business Ethical Misconduct and Cultural Values: A Cross National Comparison. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):141-157.
Cam Caldwell (2010). A ten-Step Model for Academic Integrity: A Positive Approach for Business Schools. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 92 (1):1 - 13.
Donald L. McCabe, Linda Klebe Trevino & Kenneth D. Butterfield (2001). Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):219 – 232.
Gale M. Lucas & James Friedrich (2005). Individual Differences in Workplace Deviance and Integrity as Predictors of Academic Dishonesty. Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):15 – 35.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #107,922 of 1,101,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #177,551 of 1,101,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?