David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):175-183 (2006)
Almost all ethical guidelines and legislative policies concerning biomedical research involving human subjects contain provisions about relevance of research for the participating populations, informed consent, adequate care for research induced injuries and several other safeguards but the poor continue to suffer. Globalization has further aggravated poor people’s vulnerability by exposing them to international markets. Since the developing countries are abode of higher population of the poor they have become the unholy mines of this human ore for researchers. In this paper I examine various dimensions of poverty and analyze the international ethical responses in the area of biomedical research involving human subjects in order to determine their adequacy to protect the poor against exploitation and misuse and conclude that in view of the poor’s inherent and extreme vulnerability and the failure of ethical pronouncements to protect them from misuse and exploitation, they should be excluded from being enrolled as research subjects.
|Keywords||research poor vulnerability inducement exploitation exclusion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Henk ten Have (1998). Commercialisation of Genetic Diagnostic Services. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (3):217-224.
Citations of this work BETA
Ben Fraser (2013). The Reluctant Mercenary: Vulnerability and the 'Whores of War'. Journal of Military Ethics 12 (3):235-251.
Bette Anton (1999). CQ Sources/Bibliography. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):348-350.
Raymond E. Spier (2006). Conference Summary: 'The Responsible Conduct of Basic and Clinical Research'. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):189-197.
Bette Anton (2009). CQ Sources/Bibliography. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (2):155.
Similar books and articles
C. G. Foster (1994). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (2):123-124.
Herman T. Tavani (2004). Genomic Research and Data-Mining Technology: Implications for Personal Privacy and Informed Consent. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):15-28.
Neema Sofaer & Nir Eyal (2010). The Diverse Ethics of Translational Research. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):19-30.
Andrzej Górski (2006). The Responsible Conduct of Basic and Clinical Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.
Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) (2009). The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Sara Svensson & Sven Ove Hansson (2007). Protecting People in Research: A Comparison Between Biomedical and Traffic Research. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):99-115.
Patricia A. Marshall (2005). Human Rights,Cultural Pluralism, and International Health Research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):529-557.
M. Quigley (2007). Non-Human Primates: The Appropriate Subjects of Biomedical Research? Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
James V. Lavery (ed.) (2007). Ethical Issues in International Biomedical Research: A Casebook. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #203,806 of 1,789,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #424,764 of 1,789,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?