Laws of nature, exceptions and tropes
Philosophia Scientiae 7:189-219 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJonathan Schaffer (2001). The Individuation of Tropes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):247 – 257.
Nancy Cartwright (1997). Models: The Blueprints for Laws. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):303.
David Hodgson (2001). Constraint, Empowerment, and Guidance: A Conjectural Classification of Laws of Nature. Philosophy 76 (3):341-370.
David Braddon-Mitchell (2001). Lossy Laws. Noûs 35 (2):260–277.
Markus Schrenk (2006). A Theory for Special Science Laws. In H. Bohse & S. Walter (eds.), Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. mentis.
Herman Jurjus & Harrie de Swart (2001). Implication with Possible Exceptions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):517-535.
Markus Schrenk (2007). Can Capacities Rescue Us From Ceteris Paribus Laws? In B. Gnassounou & M. Kistler (eds.), Dispositions in Philosophy and Science. Ashgate.
Uriah Kriegel (2005). Tropes and Facts. Metaphysica 6:83-90.
Markus Schrenk (2003). Real Ceteris Paribus Laws. In R. Bluhm & C. Nimtz (eds.), Proceedings of GAP.5, Bielefeld 2003. mentis.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-06-15Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
