Misleading Appearances: Searle on Assertion and Meaning [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 74 (1):115-129 (2011)
John Searle’s philosophy of language contains a notorious tension between a literalist view on the relationship between sentences and their meanings, and what—at the first glance—appears to be a virulent defence of contextualism. Appearances notwithstanding, Searle’s views on background and meaning are closer to literalism than to contextualism. Searle defines assertion in terms of the commitment to the truth of the propositional content. In absence of an independent criterion to delimit the asserted content, such a definition overgenerates—hence Searle’s commitment to literalism. His position is untenable—and this is the general lesson of the paper—, because sentence meaning cannot be used to determine the asserted content
|Keywords||Philosophy Logic Ethics Ontology Epistemology Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
William Alston (1999). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Cornell University Press.
Herman Cappelen (2005). Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Blackwell Pub..
R. Carston (2002). Thoughts and Utterances. Blackwell.
Mikhail Kissine (2012). From Contexts to Circumstances of Evaluation: Is the Trade-Off Always Innocuous? Synthese 184 (2):199-216.
Mikhail Kissine (2007). The Fallacy of Semantic Minimalism. Facta Philosophica 9 (1):23-35.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ernest LePore (ed.) (1991). John Searle and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.) (2007). John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Alan Malachowski (1988). Searle on First Person Meaning and Indeterminacy. Theoria 54 (1):25-30.
John Searle (1985). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Matthew Ratcliffe (2004). Realism, Biologism and 'the Background'. Philosophical Explorations 7 (2):149 – 166.
Kent Bach (2007). Searle Against the World : How Can Experiences Find Their Objects? In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Martin Kusch (2007). Rule Skepticism : Searle's Criticism of Kripke's Wittgenstein. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press. 143.
Georges Rey (1986). What's Really Going on in Searle's 'Chinese Room'. Philosophical Studies 50 (September):169-85.
Victor Rodych (2003). Searle Freed of Every Flaw. Acta Analytica 18 (30-31):161-175.
Jay David Atlas (2007). Meanings, Propositions, Context, and Semantical Underdeterminacy. In G. Preyer (ed.), Context Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads32 ( #63,237 of 1,410,435 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,872 of 1,410,435 )
How can I increase my downloads?