David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 75 (3):505-524 (2011)
In the spirit of James and Dewey, I ask what one might want from a theory of knowledge. Much Anglophone epistemology is centered on questions that were once highly pertinent, but are no longer central to broader human and scientific concerns. The first sense in which epistemology without history is blind lies in the tendency of philosophers to ignore the history of philosophical problems. A second sense consists in the perennial attraction of approaches to knowledge that divorce knowing subjects from their societies and from the tradition of socially assembling a body of transmitted knowledge. When epistemology fails to use the history of inquiry as a laboratory in which methodological claims can be tested, there is a third way in which it becomes blind. Finally, lack of attention to the growth of knowledge in various domains leaves us with puzzles about the character of the knowledge we have. I illustrate this last theme by showing how reflections on the history of mathematics can expand our options for understanding mathematical knowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nelson Goodman (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Harvard University Press.
John Dewey (2008/1958). Experience and Nature. McCutchen Pr.
Philip Kitcher (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford University Press.
Alvin I. Goldman (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press.
Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines (1996). Causation, Prediction, and Search. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):113-123.
Citations of this work BETA
Marc Lange (2015). Explanation, Existence and Natural Properties in Mathematics – A Case Study: Desargues’ Theorem. Dialectica 69 (4):435-472.
Carlo Cellucci (2015). Rethinking Knowledge. Metaphilosophy 46 (2):213-234.
Uljana Feest (2011). Remembering (Short-Term) Memory: Oscillations of an Epistemic Thing. Erkenntnis 75 (3):391-411.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (2003). The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Steve Fuller (1987). On Regulating What is Known: A Way to Social Epistemology. Synthese 73 (1):145 - 183.
Luciano Floridi (1996). Scepticism and the Foundation of Epistemology: A Study in the Metalogical Fallacies. E.J. Brill.
John Richardson (1986). Existential Epistemology: A Heideggerian Critique of the Cartesian Project. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Sturm (2011). Historical Epistemology or History of Epistemology? The Case of the Relation Between Perception and Judgment. Erkenntnis 75 (3):303-324.
Ilya Kasavin (2012). To What Extent Could Social Epistemology Accept the Naturalistic Motto? Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):351-364.
Lloyd P. Gerson (2009). Ancient Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
John Greco (2002). ``Virtues in Epistemology". In Paul Moser (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press 287--315.
Kirsti Malterud (1995). The Legitimacy of Clinical Knowledge: Towards a Medical Epistemology Embracing the Art of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (2).
Michael Williams (2001). Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. OUP Oxford.
Stephen Everson (ed.) (1990). Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Franccsca di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Matthias Steup, Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2011-10-17
Total downloads160 ( #22,384 of 1,796,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #33,592 of 1,796,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?