Reply to Helen Longino
Philosophy of Science 69 (4):569-572 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHelen Longino (1992). Hard, Soft, or Satisfying. Social Epistemology 6 (3):281 – 287.
Helen E. Longino (1994). In Search Of Feminist Epistemology. The Monist 77 (4):472-485.
Helen E. Longino (1995). Discovering Complexity. Teaching Philosophy 18 (1):80-83.
Helen Longino (1983). Ecology as Politics. Environmental Ethics 5 (2):189-190.
Helen E. Longino (1994). What Can She Know? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2):495-496.
Stéphanie Ruphy (2006). "Empiricism All the Way Down": A Defense of the Value-Neutrality of Science in Response to Helen Longino's Contextual Empiricism. Perspectives on Science 14 (2):189-214.
Philip Kitcher (2002). The Third Way: Reflections on Helen Longino's the Fate of Knowledge. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):549-559.
Helen E. Longino (1997). Feminist Epistemology as a Local Epistemology: Helen E. Longino. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71 (1):19–36.
Helen E. Longino (2002). Reply to Philip Kitcher. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):573-577.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads32 ( #37,960 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
