The third way: Reflections on Helen Longino's the fate of knowledge
Philosophy of Science 69 (4):549-559 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStéphanie Ruphy (2006). "Empiricism All the Way Down": A Defense of the Value-Neutrality of Science in Response to Helen Longino's Contextual Empiricism. Perspectives on Science 14 (2):189-214.
K. Brad Wray (1999). A Defense of Longino's Social Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):552.
Sharon L. Crasnow (1993). Can Science Be Objective? Longino's Science as Social Knowledge. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (3):194-201.
Helen Longino, The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Helen Longino (2005). Circles of Reason: Some Feminist Reflections on Reason and Rationality. Episteme 2 (1):79-88.
Helen E. Longino (2002). Reply to Philip Kitcher. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):573-577.
Philip Kitcher (2002). Reply to Helen Longino. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):569-572.
Helen E. Longino (1997). Feminist Epistemology as a Local Epistemology: Helen E. Longino. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71 (1):19–36.
Karyn L. Freedman (2009). Diversity and the Fate of Objectivity. Social Epistemology 23 (1):45-56.
Helen Longino (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads42 ( #26,974 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
