David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):121-149 (2002)
The German physicist Heinrich Hertz played a decisive role for Wittgenstein's use of a unique philosophical method. Wittgenstein applied this method successfully to critical problems in logic and mathematics throughout his life. Logical paradoxes and foundational problems including those of mathematics were seen as pseudo-problems requiring clarity instead of solution. In effect, Wittgenstein's controversial response to David Hilbert and Kurt Gödel was deeply influenced by Hertz and can only be fully understood when seen in this context. To comprehend the arguments against the metamathematical programme, and to appreciate how profoundly the philosophical method employed actually shaped the content of Wittgenstein's philosophy, it is necessary to make an intellectual biographical reconstruction of their philosophical framework, tracing the Hertzian elements in the early as well as in the later writings. In order to write Wittgenstein's biography, we have to take seriously the coherence of his thought throughout his life, and not let convenient philosophical ideologies be our guidance in drawing up a “Wittgensteinian philosophy”. To do so, we have to take a second look upon what he actually wrote, not only in the already published material, but in the entire Nachlass. Clearly, this is not easily done, but it is a necessary task in the historical reconstruction of Wittgenstein's life and work.
|Keywords||Wittgenstein Hertz Boltzmann Russell Hilbert Gödel philosophy of science nineteenth-century physics picture theory metamathematics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
David G. Stern (2000). The Significance of Jewishness for Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Inquiry 43 (4):383 – 401.
David LaRocca (2007). Changing the Subject: The Auto/Biographical as the Philosophical in Wittgenstein. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):169-184.
Chrysoula Gitsoulis (2007). The Moral Dimension of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Method. Analysis and Metaphysics (Special Issue on Wittgenstein) 6:452-467.
Rom Harré (2001). Wittgenstein: Science and Religion. Philosophy 76 (2):211-237.
Sara Bizarro (2010). A Hertzian Interpretation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 13:150-165.
John Preston (2006). Janik on Hertz and the Early Wittgenstein. Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):83-95.
David G. Stern (1994). Recent Work on Wittgenstein, 1980–1990. [REVIEW] Synthese 98 (3):415-458.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #105,473 of 1,907,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #276,357 of 1,907,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?