David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):161-169 (2010)
The article deals with trust in applied social science research in the light of applied researchers’ increased dependence on project funding. Taking Norway as a case study it shows how the societal organization of research funding has implications for scientific freedom and ultimately for the confidence we have in research. The article gives an account of various ways the sponsors can influence on applied social science research and discusses the legitimacy of different limitations on scientific freedom. The article concludes with proposals for how the challenges to scientific freedom posed by the research funding framework can be addressed structurally, as well as on the level of the research community
|Keywords||Scientific freedom Applied social sciences Sponsors Norway|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Vince Ham (1999). Tracking the Truth or Selling One's Soul? Reflections on the Ethics of a Piece of Commissioned Research. British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (3):275 - 282.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Torsten Wilholt (2009). Bias and Values in Scientific Research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (1):92-101.
Dorota Śwituła (2006). The Concept of Quality in Clinical Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):147-156.
Nancy L. Jones (2007). A Code of Ethics for the Life Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):25-43.
E. Mamchur (1990). Is There an Ivory Tower in Reality? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):101 – 111.
John T. Sanders & Wade L. Robison (1992). Research Funding and the Value-Dependence of Science. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 11 (1):33-50.
Gerard Radnitzky (1976). Prinzipielle Problemstellungen der Forschungspolitik. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 7 (2):367-403.
Simone van der Burg (2011). Taking the “Soft Impacts” of Technology Into Account: Broadening the Discourse in Research Practice. Social Epistemology 23 (3):301-316.
Carl M. Skooglund & Steven P. Nichols (1998). Friend or Foe: A Brief Examination of the Ethics of Corporate Sponsored Research at Universities. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):385-390.
William H. Starbuck (2006). The Production of Knowledge: The Challenge of Social Science Research. OUP Oxford.
Andrew H. Van de Ven (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. OUP Oxford.
Torsten Wilholt (2010). Scientific Freedom: Its Grounds and Their Limitations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):174-181.
Jean Bethke Elshtain (2008). Why Science Cannot Stand Alone. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):161-169.
Leonard Krimerman (2001). Participatory Action Research: Should Social Inquiry Be Conducted Democratically? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):60-82.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1993). The Aim and Structure of Applied Research. Erkenntnis 38 (1):1 - 21.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads6 ( #206,773 of 1,102,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,523 of 1,102,762 )
How can I increase my downloads?