Ethics and Action: A Relational Perspective on Consumer Choice in the European Politics of Food [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):145-162 (2012)
The lack of consistency between people’s engagement in ethical issues and their food choices has received considerable attention. Consumption as “choice” dominates this discourse, understood as decision-making at the point of purchase. But ideas concentrating on individual choice are problematic when trying to understand how social and ethical issues emerge and are dealt with in the practices of buying and eating food. I argue in this paper that “consumer choice” is better understood as a political ideology addressing a particular way in which everyday practices can be directed so as to solve social problems. It is a way that makes questions of power particularly challenging. Some assume consumer sovereignty, emphasizing consumer choice as a reflection of neoliberal deregulation and commercialization. Others worry that ongoing changes increase consumers’ powerlessness. None of these seem to capture that there is active regulation, where public as well as commercial and civil actors are making strong efforts to make people do the right thing—voluntarily. Labeling is the key measure. In practice, the individualized and rationalized model of responsibility depends not only on market opportunities, but even political and social expectations and trust. People may lack concrete capabilities and power to follow up on moral calls, but they may also have a different understanding of who is responsible and what is a “good deed,” or their actions may, in a Foucauldian sense, represent resistance. The paper will, with examples from European empirical studies, discuss how mobilization as well as inertia and disinterest emerge within specific political constellations and practical contexts.
|Keywords||Food Consumption Political consumerism Ethics Trust Labeling|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Tracy B. Strong (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Michael Power (1999). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (1):92-94.
Iris Vermeir & Wim Verbeke (2006). Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (2):169-194.
Steven Lukes & Jack H. Nagel (1976). Power: A Radical View. Political Theory 4 (2):246-249.
Ulrich Beck, Wolfgang Bonss & Christoph Lau (2003). The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme. Theory, Culture and Society 20 (2):1-33.
Citations of this work BETA
Marina Di Masso & Christos Zografos (2015). Constructing Food Sovereignty in Catalonia: Different Narratives for Transformative Action. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (2):183-198.
Laura Emma Milani Marin & Vincenzo Russo (2016). Re-Localizing ‘Legal’ Food: A Social Psychology Perspective on Community Resilience, Individual Empowerment and Citizen Adaptations in Food Consumption in Southern Italy. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (1):179-190.
Carmen Valor, Isabel Carrero & Raquel Redondo (2014). The Influence of Knowledge and Motivation on Sustainable Label Use. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (4):591-607.
Similar books and articles
Frans W. A. Brom (2000). Food, Consumer Concerns, and Trust: Food Ethics for a Globalizing Market. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):127-139.
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2011). Consumer Autonomy and Availability of Genetically Modified Food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):147-163.
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2008). Consumer Autonomy and Sufficiency of Gmf Labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):353-369.
Dirk Haen (2014). The Paradox of E-Numbers: Ethical, Aesthetic, and Cultural Concerns in the Dutch Discourse on Food Additives. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (1):27-42.
Volkert Beekman (2008). Consumer Rights to Informed Choice on the Food Market. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (1):61 - 72.
Johannes Brinkmann (2004). Looking at Consumer Behavior in a Moral Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):129-141.
Franck L. B. Meijboom, Tatjana Visak & Frans W. A. Brom (2006). From Trust to Trustworthiness: Why Information is Not Enough in the Food Sector. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):427-442.
Ruth Chadwick (2000). Novel, Natural, Nutritious: Towards a Philosophy of Food. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):193–208.
Johan de Tavernier (2012). Food Citizenship: Is There a Duty for Responsible Consumption? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):895-907.
Tatiana Klompenhouwer & Henk van den Belt (2003). Regulating Functional Foods in the European Union: Informed Choice Versus Consumer Protection? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):545-556.
Michiel Korthals (2001). Taking Consumers Seriously: Two Concepts of Consumer Sovereignty. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):201-215.
Harry J. van Buren Iii & Douglas E. Thomas (2006). Social Responsibility Through Information Disclosure and Consumer Choice. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:178-179.
L. J. Frewer, A. Kole, S. M. A. Van de Kroon & C. de Lauwere (2005). Consumer Attitudes Towards the Development of Animal-Friendly Husbandry Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (4):345-367.
Michele Graffeo, Lucia Savadori, Katya Tentori, Nicolao Bonini & Rino Rumiati (2009). Consumer Decision in the Context of a Food Hazard: The Effect of Commitment. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 8 (1):59-76.
Luigi Cembalo, Giuseppina Migliore & Giorgio Schifani (2013). Sustainability and New Models of Consumption: The Solidarity Purchasing Groups in Sicily. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):281-303.
Added to index2011-06-26
Total downloads9 ( #374,109 of 1,911,412 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #251,182 of 1,911,412 )
How can I increase my downloads?