Legal Adjudication and Democracy: Some Remarks on Dworkin and Habermas
European Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):36-54 (1995)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSteven J. Burton (1992). Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Leiter (2007). Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Mitchell Aboulafia, Myra Orbach Bookman & Cathy Kemp (eds.) (2002). Habermas and Pragmatism. Routledge.
Antoni Abad I. Ninet & Josep Monserrat Molas (2009). Habermas and Ackerman: A Synthesis Applied to the Legitimation and Codification of Legal Norms. Ratio Juris 22 (4):510-531.
Thom Brooks (2007). Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory. Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Brian Bix (2008). Legal Philosophy in America. In C. J. Misak (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Hugh Baxter (2011). Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Stanford Law Books.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads26 ( #47,706 of 549,550 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,550 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
