David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 15 (2):209-228 (2000)
There are many reasons to assume that the contents expressible by declarative sentences are generally truth-evaluable (reasons stemming from semantics, logic and considerations about truth). This assumption of global truth-evaluability, however, appears to conflict with the view that the contents of some sentences do not admit of truth or falsehood for lack of objectivity of their subject matter. Could there be a notion of truth on which the truth-evaluability of a content does not rule out the non-objectivity of its subject matter?In this paper, I discuss Crispin Wright's criterion of Cognitive Command as a criterion for objectivity. This criterion faces the Problem of A Priori Error. I reject Wright's response to that problem and propose to solve the problem by relativising truth. This move allows for the possibility of contents that are truth-evaluable yet non-objective
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Albin (2012). BEYOND MODES OF OBJECTIVITY. Logos and Episteme (3):361-371.
Josh Parsons (2013). Command and Consequence. Philosophical Studies 164 (1):61-92.
Crispin Wright (1992). Truth and Objectivity. Harvard University Press.
Lorraine Daston (2007). Objectivity. Distributed by the Mit Press.
Max Kölbel (1997). Expressivism and the Syntactic Uniformity of Declarative Sentences. Critica 29 (87):3–51.
J. L. Gorman (1974). Objectivity and Truth in History. Inquiry 17 (1-4):373 – 397.
Nir Fresco (2008). An Analysis of the Criteria for Evaluating Adequate Theories of Computation. Minds and Machines 18 (3):379-401.
Ian Rumfitt (1995). Truth Wronged: Crispin Wright's Truth and Objectivity. Ratio 8 (1):100-107.
Philip Pettit (1996). Review: Realism and Truth: A Comment on Crispin Wright's Truth and Objectivity. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):883 - 890.
M. R. Wright (1991). The Criterion of Truth Pamela Huby, Gordon Neal: The Criterion of Truth: Essays Written in Honour of George Kerferd, Together with a Text and Translation (with Annotations) of Ptolemy's On the Kriterion and Hegemonikon. Pp. Xiv + 301. Frontispiece Photograph of G. B. Kerferd. Liverpool University Press, 1989. £12.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):109-111.
Evelyn Wortsman Deluty (2005). Wittgenstein's Paradox. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):87-102.
B. D. Ellis (1990). Truth and Objectivity. Basil Blackwell.
R. Lanier Anderson (1998). Truth and Objectivity in Perspectivism. Synthese 115 (1):1-32.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads9 ( #159,722 of 1,102,850 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,639 of 1,102,850 )
How can I increase my downloads?