Monsters we met, monsters we made

Sign Systems Studies 37 (3/4):454-475 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Creatures living under the rule of domestication form a communicative union based on shared morphological, behavioural, cognitive, and immunologicalresemblances. Domestic animals live under particular conditions that substantially differ from the original (natural) settings of their wild relatives. Here we focus on the fact that many parallel characters have appeared in various domestic forms that had been selected for different purposes. These characters are often unique for domestic animals and do not exist in wild forms. We argue that parallel similarities appear in different groups in response to their interaction with theumwelt of a particular host. In zoosemiotic sense, the process of domestication represents a kind of interaction in which both sides are affected and eventuallytransformed in such a way that one is more integrated with the other than in the time of initial encounter.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Сходство и ре-эволюция.Karel Kleisner - 2010 - Sign Systems Studies 38 (1/4):391-391.
Sarnasus ja taasteke.Karel Kleisner - 2010 - Sign Systems Studies 38 (1/4):392-392.
San Marco and evolutionary biology.Alasdair I. Houston - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):215-230.
Stella = Sidvs.H. J. Rose - 1932 - Classical Quarterly 26 (3-4):194-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
19 (#753,814)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references