David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Idealistic Studies 38 (3):193-207 (2008)
Kant’s Critique of Judgment and Schiller’s Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man are generally recognized as crucial documents in the development of modern aesthetics away from rule-based conceptions of objectivity. This paper claims that they are also, in crucial ways, circular. In both Kant and Schiller, aesthetic taste turns out to be grounded in the realm of the social in a way that challenges the idealist notion that aesthetic evaluation and education would—or should—occur against the backdrop of humanity in general, rather than of concrete communities. The threat of conceptual circularity, I claim, is thus directly tied to the ineradicable significance of social circles for the articulation of Kant’s and Schiller’s aesthetics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nathan Ross (2010). The Debt of Philosophical Hermeneutics to Schiller's Letters on Aesthetic Education. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):203-219.
Friedrich Schiller (1967/1992). On the Aesthetic Education of Man: In a Series of Letters. Oxford University Press.
Adrian Piper (2009). Intuition and Concrete Particularity in Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic. In Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O'Connor (eds.), Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices From Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Stanford University Press.
Friedrich Schiller (1954/2004). On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Dover Publications.
Albert Hofstadter (1975). Kant's Aesthetic Revolution. Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.
Lambert Zuidervaart (2003). Cultural Paths and Aesthetic Signs: A Critical Hermeneutics of Aesthetic Validity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (3):315-340.
Henry E. Allison (2001). Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Nicholas Martin (1996). Nietzsche and Schiller: Untimely Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Samantha Matherne (2013). The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant's Aesthetic Ideas. British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):21-39.
Peter Howarth (2007). Creative Writing and Schiller's Aesthetic Education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3):41-58.
Paul Guyer (1997). Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge University Press.
Adrian M. S. Piper (2009). Intuition and Concrete Particularity in Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic. In Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O'Connor (eds.), Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices From Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Stanford University Press.
Dorit Barchana-lorand & Efrat Galnoor (2009). Philosophy of Art Education in the Visual Culture: Aesthetics for Art Teachers. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):133-148.
C. E. Emmer (2001). The Senses of the Sublime: Possibilities for a Non-Ocular Sublime in Kant's Critique of Judgment. In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads1 ( #438,823 of 1,101,150 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,630 of 1,101,150 )
How can I increase my downloads?