Huck Finn the inverse akratic: Empathy and justice [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):257 - 266 (2009)
An inverse akratic act is one who believes X, all things considered, is the correct act, and yet performs ~X, where ~X is the correct act. A famous example of such a person is Huck Finn. He believes that he is wrong in helping Jim, and yet continues to do so. In this paper I investigate Huck’s nature to see why he performs such acts contrary to his beliefs. In doing so, I explore the nature of <span class='Hi'>empathy</span> and show how powerful Huck’s empathic feelings are. Drawing from Martin L. Hoffman, I show the relationship between <span class='Hi'>empathy</span> and a principle of justice. This relationship leads to Huck acting virtuously, as Rosalind Hursthouse maintains.
|Keywords||inverse akrasia Hursthouse empathy justice Huck Finn virtue ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nomy Arpaly & Timothy Schroeder (1999). Praise, Blame and the Whole Self. Philosophical Studies 93 (2):161-188.
Jonathan Bennett (1974). The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn. Philosophy 49 (188):123-134.
Rosalind Hursthouse (1999/2001). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Nancy E. Snow (2000). Empathy. American Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1):65 - 78.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited (II). Religious Studies 41 (3):287 - 303.
John Fennel (2002). Huck Finn and Moral Argument. Teaching Philosophy 25 (3):227-236.
Phillip Montague (1980). Re-Examining Huck Finn's Conscience. Philosophy 55 (214):542 - 546.
Ellen S. More (1996). Empathy as a Hermeneutic Practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (3).
Carol Freedman (1997). The Morality of Huck Finn. Philosophy and Literature 21 (1):102-113.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
Dale Hample, Bing Han & David Payne (2010). The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments. Argumentation 24 (4):405-421.
Jung H. Lee (2009). The Moral Power of Jim: A Mencian Reading of Huckleberry Finn. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):101 – 118.
Anders Schinkel (2011). Huck Finn, Moral Language and Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):511-525.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads201 ( #4,681 of 1,696,600 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #7,834 of 1,696,600 )
How can I increase my downloads?