Kicking the Kohler habit

Philosophical Psychology 20 (5):609 – 619 (2007)
Kohler's experiments with inverting goggles are often thought to support enactivism by showing that visual re-inversion occurs simultaneous with the return of sensorimotor skill. Closer examination reveals that Kohler's work does not show this. Recent work by Linden et al. shows that re-inversion, if it occurs at all, does not occur when the enactivist predicts. As such, the empirical evidence weighs against enactivism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515080701549330
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Joel Smith (2014). Egocentric Space. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (3):409-433.
Dave Ward (2015). Achieving Transparency: An Argument For Enactivism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2):n/a-n/a.
Jennifer Matey (2012). Representing the Impossible. Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

36 ( #89,956 of 1,725,465 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #211,098 of 1,725,465 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.