Graduate studies at Western
International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):23-40 (2002)
|Abstract||This article discusses the impact of Descartes’s substance-dualism on his account of discursive reason. Taking the presentation of deduction in the Rules as a paradigmatic case of thought’s extension and movement in time, I analyze the relation between intuitive and discursive understanding and that between intellect and imagination. I focus specifically on the mediation of corporeal impressions and of intellectual ideas by ingenium. As intellectual, ingenium is a faculty of understanding; as joining with phantasia, ingenium has access to corporeal affections, images, and memory. Deduction involves both of these aspects of ingenium, and Descartes’s dualism complicates efforts to clarify the operations and nature of ingenium. Thus the dynamics of dualistic psychology account for some of the limitations of deduction in particular and discursive rationality in general|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen H. Daniel (1985). Descartes on Myth and Ingenuity/Ingenium. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):157-170.
Marleen Rozemond (1993). The Role of the Intellect in Descartes's Case for the Incorporeity of the Mind. In Stephen Voss (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes.
Glenn Statile (2005). Descartes's Translation Problem. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):187-202.
Husain Sarkar (2003). Descartes' Cogito: Saved From the Great Shipwreck. Cambridge University Press.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Descartes's Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):69-89.
Corey W. Dyck (2011). Kant's Transcendental Deduction and the Ghosts of Descartes and Hume. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):473-496.
Noa Naaman Zauderer (2010). Descartes' Deontological Turn: Reason, Will, and Virtue in the Later Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Athanasse Raftopoulos (1995). Was Cartesian Science Ever Meant to Be a Priori? A Comment on Hatfield. Philosophy of Science 62 (1):150-160.
Lilli Alanen (2008). Cartesian Scientia and the Human Soul. Vivarium 46 (3):418-442.
Nathan D. Smith & Jason P. Taylor (eds.) (2005). Descartes and Cartesianism. Cambridge Scholars Press.
Gordon Hull (2006). Hobbes's Radical Nominalism. Epoché 11 (1):201-223.
Stephen Gaukroger (1997). Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Clarendon Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads5 ( #170,132 of 738,241 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 738,241 )
How can I increase my downloads?