Memory and the Extension of Thinking in Descartes's Regulae

This article discusses the impact of Descartes’s substance-dualism on his account of discursive reason. Taking the presentation of deduction in the Rules as a paradigmatic case of thought’s extension and movement in time, I analyze the relation between intuitive and discursive understanding and that between intellect and imagination. I focus specifically on the mediation of corporeal impressions and of intellectual ideas by ingenium. As intellectual, ingenium is a faculty of understanding; as joining with phantasia, ingenium has access to corporeal affections, images, and memory. Deduction involves both of these aspects of ingenium, and Descartes’s dualism complicates efforts to clarify the operations and nature of ingenium. Thus the dynamics of dualistic psychology account for some of the limitations of deduction in particular and discursive rationality in general
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/ipq200242171
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 21,357
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Stephen H. Daniel (1985). Descartes on Myth and Ingenuity/Ingenium. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):157-170.
Glenn Statile (2005). Descartes's Translation Problem. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):187-202.
Corey W. Dyck (2011). Kant's Transcendental Deduction and the Ghosts of Descartes and Hume. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):473-496.
Gordon Hull (2006). Hobbes's Radical Nominalism. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):201-223.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

13 ( #280,356 of 1,911,323 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #455,910 of 1,911,323 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.