Schopenhauer on the Individuation and Teleology of Intelligible Character

Idealistic Studies 40 (1/2):15-26 (2010)
Abstract
A problem arises in Schopenhauer’s claim that each individual person’s will, or intelligible character, is timeless. The principium individuationis depends upon spatio-temporal determinations governing the world as representation. As individual, one’s individual character would seem to depend upon spatio-temporalconditions. Yet, Schopenhauer adopts the Kantian distinction between empirical character and intelligible character, with the individual’s intelligible characterremaining the timeless Ding-an-sich, or will. In response to this problem, I proceed in four stages. First, I examine why Schopenhauer appropriated the Kantiandistinction between intelligible and empirical character. Secondly, I argue in favor of the solution which indicates that, for Schopenhauer, each individual’s intelligible character is related to the Platonic Idea unique to that individual. In the third stage, I determine how the teleological claims in Schopenhauer’s doctrineof Ideas bear on the problem. In the fourth stage, I suggest how Schopenhauer’s account presents a phenomenology of the unity of consciousness
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,412
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Dale Jacquette (2000). Schopenhauer on the Ethics of Suicide. Continental Philosophy Review 33 (1):43-58.
Richard White (2010). Schopenhauer and Indian Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):57-76.
Arati Barua (2005). Schopenhauer and Krausz on Objects of Interpretation. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):33-37.
Arati Barua (2008). Schopenhauer's Philosophy of Will and Sankara's Advaita Vedanta. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:23-29.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

7 ( #188,579 of 1,103,045 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #120,820 of 1,103,045 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.