David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (1):77-97 (1998)
This article provides a critical discussion of the problems raised by Kant’s characterization of reason as having ‘needs’ and ‘interests’. The first part presents two examples of arguments in which this conative characterization of reason plays a crucial role. The rest of the article consists of a discussion of four different interpretations of Kant's talk of reason as having needs and interests. Having identified a number of problems with literal interpretations of the conative characterization of reason, I examine whether a metaphorical reading, suggested by several commentators, can solve these problems. I argue that it is impossible to regard the conative terms in which Kant describes reason as merely decorative metaphors, and that they are better understood as cases of ‛symbolic exhibition' in Kant's own sense.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Zammito (2006). Teleology Then and Now: The Question of Kant's Relevance for Contemporary Controversies Over Function in Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (4):748-770.
John Zammito (2006). Teleology Then and Now: The Question of Kant’s Relevance for Contemporary Controversies Over Function in Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (4):748-770.
Similar books and articles
Sebastian Gardner (1999). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. Routledge.
Alexander Von Schoenborn (1991). Kant's Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered. Philosophy and Theology 6 (2):101-116.
Motohide Saji (2009). On the Division Between Reason and Unreason in Kant. Human Studies 32 (2):201 - 223.
Phil Enns (2007). Reason and Revelation: Kant and the Problem of Authority. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):103 - 114.
Kjartan Koch Mikalsen (2010). Testimony and Kant's Idea of Public Reason. Res Publica 16 (1):23-40.
Kyriaki Goudeli, Pavlos Kontos & Iole Patelle (eds.) (2007). Kant: Making Reason Intuitive. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pauline Kleingeld (2006). Kant’s Theory of Peace. In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
Susan Neiman (1994). The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant. Oxford University Press.
Pauline Kleingeld (2010). Moral Consciousness and the 'Fact of Reason'. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Pauline Kleingeld (1998). Kant on the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason. Review of Metaphysics 52 (2):500-528.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #82,284 of 1,789,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #93,512 of 1,789,998 )
How can I increase my downloads?