David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 37 (3):385-416 (2007)
I examine Heidegger's reflections on the Anaximander fragment, concentrating on the question of justice. In his commentary, Heidegger draws on Nietzsche's thoughts about justice, the will to power, and nihilism to formulate an interpretation of the fragment that connects it to the epochal history and destiny of being. This "ontological" interpretation, constructed in a compelling reading of the history of philosophy, requires that Heidegger first address the historicism and "ontological forgetfulness" prevailing in historical consciousness and historiography, in order to begin thinking towards the possibility of another epoch of being, releasing us from the injustice that is inherent in the ontology that rules in the present historical dispensation. Although Heidegger avoids moral prescription, he cannot avoid critical entanglement in the moral-juridical sense of justice, despite his claims and protestations, since, as his own account of the fragment implies, justice and ontology must be inseparable. Reading Heidegger's commentary in relation to Benjamin's philosophy of history, I argue that Heidegger's reflections on justice suggest a narrative of tragic hope that resembles Benjamin's configuration of justice in his reading of the Baroque mourning-play, where the hopelessly fragmented and imperiled image of justice is revealed as emerging from a Leidensgeschichte fatefully bound up in the continuum of a Schuldgeschichte
|Keywords||tragedy time fate justice destiny|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Björn Thorsteinsson (2015). From Différance to Justice: Derrida and Heidegger’s “Anaximander’s Saying”. Continental Philosophy Review 48 (2):255-271.
Similar books and articles
Karin De Boer (1997). Giving Due: Heidegger's Interpretation of the Anaximander Fragment. Research in Phenomenology 27 (1):150-166.
Elina Staikou (2008). Justice's Last Word: Derrida's Post-Scriptum to Force of Law. Derrida Today 1 (2):266-290.
Joyce Engmann (1991). Cosmic Justice in Anaximander. Phronesis 36 (1):1 - 25.
Anaximander & Arthur Fairbanks (1898). Anaximander Fragments and Commentary (The First Philosophers of Greece). K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.
Hualing Fu & Richard Cullen, From Mediatory to Adjudicatory Justice: The Limits of Civil Justice Reform in China.
G. B. Kerferd (1963). A Metaphysical Anaximander Paul Seligman: The Apeiron of Anaximander. A Study in the Origin Function of Metaphysical Ideas. Pp. X+181. London: Athlone Press, 1962. Cloth, 42s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (03):275-277.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #116,180 of 1,935,082 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,530 of 1,935,082 )
How can I increase my downloads?