The Ethics of “Following Nature” in Forestry
Environmental Ethics 31 (1):67-84 (2009)
| Abstract | Analysis of academic forest scientists’ ethical reasoning and values given decision-making scenarios indicates that Holmes Rolston, III’s value theory, specifically his ethics of “following nature” is an important and current environmental ethics in forestry. Nevertheless, while academic forest scientists appear to espouse “following nature” in decision making, they also make use of numerous other values and ethics. Academic forest scientists’ moral reasoning is more akin to a pragmatic approach to decision making rather than an approach based on building or advocating an internally consistent and coherent moral position. Rolston’s environmental ethics is relevant and useful to decision making in forestry if it is interpreted as one among various value theories used to guide decision making rather than an ethical theory to be accepted or rejected en bloc | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Andrew Baldwin (2004). An Ethics of Connection: Social-Nature in Canada's Boreal Forest. Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (3):185 – 194.
Hugh Williams (1996). What is Good Forestry?: An Ethical Examination of Forest Policy and Practice in New Brunswick. Environmental Ethics 18 (4):391-410.
Dawn R. Elm & Tara J. Radin (2012). Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different? Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):313-329.
Johanna Kujala & Tarja Pietiläinen (2004). Female Managers' Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):153-163.
Kieran Mathieson (2007). Towards a Design Science of Ethical Decision Support. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (3):269 - 292.
Joseph G. P. Paolillo & Scott J. Vitell (2002). An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personal, Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 35 (1):65 - 74.
Chris Robertson & Paul A. Fadil (1999). Ethical Decision Making in Multinational Organizations: A Culture-Based Model. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):385 - 392.
Michael D. Mumford, Shane Connelly, Stephen T. Murphy, Lynn D. Devenport, Alison L. Antes, Ryan P. Brown, Jason H. Hill & Ethan P. Waples (2009). Field and Experience Influences on Ethical Decision Making in the Sciences. Ethics and Behavior 19 (4):263 – 289.
Ethan P. Waples, Jason H. Hill, Alison L. Antes, Lynn D. Devenport, Stephen T. Murphy, Shane Connelly, Michael D. Mumford & Ryan P. Brown (2009). Field and Experience Influences on Ethical Decision Making in the Sciences. Ethics and Behavior 19 (4):263-289.
Ethan P. Waples, Jason H. Hill, Alison L. Antes, Lynn D. Devenport, Stephen T. Murphy, Shane Connelly, Michael D. Mumford & Ryan P. Brown (2009). Field and Experience Influences on Ethical Decision Making in the Sciences. Ethics and Behavior 19 (4):263-289.
David Fritzsche & E. Oz (2007). Personal Values' Influence on the Ethical Dimension of Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):335 - 343.
Clare M. Pennino (2002). Is Decision Style Related to Moral Development Among Managers in the U.S.? Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):337 - 347.
Kevin Morrell (2004). Decision Making and Business Ethics: The Implications of Using Image Theory in Preference to Rational Choice. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (3):239-252.
Taru Peltola (2007). Business on the Margin: Local Practices and the Politics of Forests in Finland. Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (1):29 – 47.
R. J. Nelson (1979). Ethics and Environmental Decision Making. Environmental Ethics 1 (3):263-278.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-02-24Total downloads20 ( #62,418 of 556,909 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #16,193 of 556,909 )How can I increase my downloads? |

