The revenge of Pythagoras: How a mathematical sharp practice undermines the contemporary design argument in astrophysical cosmology
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (3):331-354 (2002)
|Abstract||Recent developments in astrophysical cosmology have revived support for the design argument among a growing clique of astrophysicists. I show that the scientific/mathematical evidence cited in support of intelligent design of the universe is infected with a mathematical sharp practice: the concepts of two numbers being of the same order of magnitude, and of being within an order of each other, have been stretched from their proper meanings so as to doctor the numbers evidentially. This practice started with A. S. Eddington and P. A. M. Dirac in the 1920s and 1930s, but it is still very much alive today. 1 Introduction 2 The birth of a sharp practice 3 High tide for the anthropic principle 4 How not to do things with numbers 5 The recalcitrant sloppiness of crud 6 How excited can excited carbon-12 be? 7 Is a pile of doubts a doubtful pile? 8 Conclusion.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Armin W. Schulz (2008). Structural Flaws: Massive Modularity and the Argument From Design. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
Paul Davies (2003). The Appearance of Design in Physics and Cosmology. In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
Christopher Monson (2005). Practical Discourse: Learning and the Ethical Construction of Environmental Design Practice. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (2):181 – 200.
Ian J. Dove (2009). Towards a Theory of Mathematical Argument. Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):136-152.
Andrew Arana (2007). Review of D. Corfield, Toward a Philosophy of Real Mathematics. [REVIEW] Mathematical Intelligencer 29 (2).
Elliott Sober, Sex Ratio Theory, Ancient and Modern — an 18th Century Debate About Intelligent Design and the Development of Models in Evolutionary Biology.
Andrew Arana (2007). Review of D. Corfield's Toward A Philosophy Of Real Mathematics. [REVIEW] Mathematical Intelligencer 29 (2).
Peter Purgathofer (2006). Is Informatics a Design Discipline? Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):303-314.
Mark A. Walker & M. Milan (2006). Astrophysical Fine Tuning, Naturalism, and the Contemporary Design Argument. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285 – 307.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #58,633 of 548,977 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,977 )
How can I increase my downloads?