Argumentation 16 (4):383-400 (2002)
|Abstract||Attempts to evaluate a belief or argument on the basis of its cause or origin are usually condemned as committing the genetic fallacy. However, I sketch a number of cases in which causal or historical factors are logically relevant to evaluating a belief, including an interesting abductive form that reasons from the best explanation for the existence of a belief to its likely truth. Such arguments are also susceptible to refutation by genetic reasoning that may come very close to the standard examples given of supposedly fallacious genetic reasoning|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Plomin (1998). Genetic Influence and Cognitive Abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):420-421.
Armin W. Schulz (2009). Condorcet and Communitarianism: Boghossian's Fallacious Inference. Synthese 166 (1):55 - 68.
Antoinette Rouvroy (2008). Human Genes and Neoliberal Governance: A Foucauldian Critique. Routledge-Cavendish.
Fred Gifford (1990). Genetic Traits. Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):327-347.
Ludvig Beckman (2004). Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6).
Lisa Gannett (1999). What's in a Cause?: The Pragmatic Dimensions of Genetic Explanations. Biology and Philosophy 14 (3).
B. M. Kious (2010). Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.
Paul Helm (2001). The Indispensability of Belief to Religion. Religious Studies 37 (1):75-86.
V. Launis (2000). The Use of Genetic Test Information in Insurance: The Argument From Indistinguishability Reconsidered. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3).
Added to index2009-11-27
Total downloads45 ( #24,555 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?