David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford University Press (1995)
Our current intellectual system provides us with a far more complete and accurate understanding of nature and ourselves than was available in any previous society. This gain in understanding has arisen from two sources: the use of the 'scientific method', and the breaking up of our intellectual enterprise into increasingly narrower disciplines and research programmes. However, we have failed to keep these narrow specialities connected to the intellectual enterprise as a whole. The author demonstrates that this causes a number of difficulties. We have no viewpoint from which we can understand the relationships between the disciplines and lack a forum for adjudicating situations where different disciplines give conflicting answers to the same problem. We seriously underestimate the differences in methodology and in the nature of principles in the various branches of science. This provocative and wide-ranging book provides a detailed analysis and possible solutions for dealing with this problem.
|Keywords||Interdisciplinary approach to knowledge|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$20.53 used (70% off) $59.80 new (12% off) $67.50 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD255.K547 1995|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jan C. Schmidt (2007). Towards a Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity. Poiesis and Praxis 5 (1):53-69.
Andrea Bonaccorsi (2008). Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science. Minerva 46 (3):285-315.
Jan C. Schmidt (2011). What is a Problem? Poiesis and Praxis 7 (4):249-274.
Lluís Oviedo (2006). Is Christian Theology Well Suited to Enter the Discussion Between Science and Humanism? Zygon 41 (4):825-842.
Michael H. G. Hoffmann, Jan C. Schmidt & Nancy J. Nersessian (2013). Philosophy of and as Interdisciplinarity. Synthese 190 (11):1857-1864.
Similar books and articles
Robert Frodeman (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
Trace Jordan (1989). Themes and Schemes: A Philosophical Approach to Interdisciplinary Science Teaching. Synthese 80 (1):63--79.
Sven Ove Hansson (2008). Philosophy and Other Disciplines. Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):472-483.
Myra H. Strober (2006). Habits of the Mind: Challenges for Multidisciplinary Engagement. Social Epistemology 20 (3 & 4):315 – 331.
A. Riegler & H. Gash (2011). Legacy of a Great Thinker. Editorial for the Commemorative Issue for Ernst von Glasersfeld. Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):135-137.
Mathias M. Siems, The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert.
Francesco Coniglione (2009). Introduction: The Coming of the Knowledge Society and the Challenges for the Future of Europe. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 19 (4):353-372.
James William Lett (1987). The Human Enterprise: A Critical Introduction to Anthropological Theory. Westview Press.
Patrick J. J. Phillips (2001). Conceptual Foundations for Multidisciplinary Thinking. International Studies in Philosophy 33 (4):132-133.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #478,755 of 1,911,082 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,075 of 1,911,082 )
How can I increase my downloads?