David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Natural Language Semantics 20 (2):137-175 (2012)
There are certain uses of and and or that cannot be explained by their normal meanings as truth-functional connectives, even with sophisticated pragmatic resources. These include examples such as The cops show up, and a fight will break out (‘If the cops show up, a fight will break out’), and I have no friends, or I would throw a party (‘I have no friends. If I did have friends, I would throw a party.’). We argue that these uses are indeed distinct from the more ordinary uses of and and or, but that they are nonetheless related in a principled way. To explain them we give an analysis of what we call the dynamic effects of connectives, which arise in all their uses. The special uses at issue are then argued to be instances where the connectives exhibit their dynamic effects without their truth-conditional meaning
|Keywords||Connectives Dynamic semantics Modals|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Seth Yalcin (2007). Epistemic Modals. Mind 116 (464):983-1026.
Irene Heim (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Dissertation, UMass Amherst
David Lewis (1979). Attitudes de Dicto and de Se. Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
John MacFarlane (2009). Epistemic Modals Are Assessment-Sensitive. In Andy Egan & B. Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press
Frank Veltman (1996). Defaults in Update Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (3):221 - 261.
Citations of this work BETA
John Hawthorne, Daniel Rothschild & Levi Spectre (forthcoming). Belief is Weak. Philosophical Studies:1-12.
Malte Willer (forthcoming). An Update on Epistemic Modals. Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-15.
Similar books and articles
Lloyd Humberstone (2011). The Connectives. MIT Press.
Ian Rumfitt (2012). On A Neglected Path to Intuitionism. Topoi 31 (1):101-109.
Philip Kremer (2009). Dynamic Topological S5. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):96-116.
I. L. Humberstone (1990). Expressive Power and Semantic Completeness: Boolean Connectives in Modal Logic. Studia Logica 49 (2):197 - 214.
Lloyd Humberstone (2006). Identical Twins, Deduction Theorems, and Pattern Functions: Exploring the Implicative BCsK Fragment of S. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (5):435 - 487.
Lloyd Humberstone (2007). Identical Twins, Deduction Theorems, and Pattern Functions: Exploring the Implicative BCsK Fragment of S. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):435 - 487.
Fabio Del Prete (2008). A Non-Uniform Semantic Analysis of the Italian Temporal Connectives Prima and Dopo. Natural Language Semantics 16 (2):157-203.
Philippe Schlenker (2007). Anti-Dynamics: Presupposition Projection Without Dynamic Semantics. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (3):325--356.
Rafał Urbaniak (2006). On Representing Sentential Connectives of Lesniewski's Elementary Protothetic. Journal of Logic and Computation 16 (4):451-460.
Xavier Caicedo (2004). Implicit Connectives of Algebraizable Logics. Studia Logica 78 (1-2):155 - 170.
Gerald J. Massey (1966). The Theory of Truth Tabular Connectives, Both Truth Functional and Modal. Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (4):593-608.
Xavier Caicedo & Roberto Cignoli (2001). An Algebraic Approach to Intuitionistic Connectives. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1620-1636.
J. C. Beall (2010). Logic: The Basics. Routledge.
Added to index2010-12-14
Total downloads56 ( #59,268 of 1,724,733 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #50,588 of 1,724,733 )
How can I increase my downloads?