David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In his admirably clear, beautifully argued study, Claude Panaccio has provided an able defense of Ockham’s position in response to an argument I presented against Ockham in a discussion with Peter King eight years ago at a meeting in Pittsburgh.1 But after eight years, and even after Claude’s book, I still stand by that argument. So, in these comments I will attempt to explain why I think Ockham may still not be off the hook.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Pascal Massie (2004). Saving Contingency. Epoché 8 (2):333-350.
Alvin Plantinga (1986). On Ockham's Way Out. Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):235-269.
Alfred Freddoso (1983). Logic, Ontology and Ockham’s Christology. The New Scholasticism 57 (3):293-330.
Stephen Chak Tornay (1938). Ockham: Studies and Selections. La Salle, Ill.,The Open Court Publishing Company.
P. Garcia & F. Esteva (1995). On Ockham Algebras: Congruence Lattices and Subdirectly Irreducible Algebras. Studia Logica 55 (2):319 - 346.
William Ockham (1983). Predestination, Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents. Indianapolis: Hackett.
William J. Courtenay (2008). Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Brill.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #67,388 of 1,004,733 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,733 )
How can I increase my downloads?