Intentional transfer in averroes, indifference of nature in avicenna, and the issue of the representationalism of Aquinas
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Is Aquinas a representationalist or a direct realist? Max Herrera’s (and, for that matter, Claude Panaccio’s) qualified answers to each alternative show that the real significance of the question is not that if we answer it, then we can finally learn under which classification Aquinas should fall, but rather that upon considering it we can learn something about the intricacies of the question itself. In these comments I will first argue that the Averroistic notion of “intentional transfer”, combined with the Avicennean idea of the indifference of nature, yielding the Thomistic doctrine of the formal unity of the knower and the known renders the question moot with regard to Aquinas, indeed, with regard to the pre-modern epistemological tradition in general. These considerations will then lead to a number of further, both historical and philosophical questions, which I will offer in the end for further discussion.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rahim Acar (2005). Talking About God and Talking About Creation: Avicenna's and Thomas Aquinas' Positions. Brill.
Richard C. Taylor & Max Herrera (2005). Aquinas's Naturalized Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:85-102.
Brian Francis Conolly (2007). Averroes, Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on How is Man Understands. Vivarium 45 (1):69-92.
Eugene F. Rogers Jr (1999). Aquinas on Natural Law and the Virtues in Biblical Context: Homosexuality as a Test Case. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):29 - 56.
Michael Rota (2007). The Moral Status of Anger: Thomas Aquinas and John Cassian. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):395-418.
John Haldane & Patrick Lee (2003). Aquinas on Human Ensoulment, Abortion and the Value of Life. Philosophy 78 (2):255-278.
Ignacio Silva (2013). Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas Within Today's Debate on Divine Action. Heythrop Journal 54 (4):658-667.
Andrew Jaspers (2007). Intentio and Praeter Intentionem in the Constitution of the Moral Object in Thomas Aquinas. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:149-159.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #74,294 of 1,410,041 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #107,760 of 1,410,041 )
How can I increase my downloads?