|Abstract||Saint Anselm’s proof for God’s existence in his Proslogion, as the label “ontological” retrospectively hung on it indicates, is usually treated as involving some sophisticated problem of, or a much less sophisticated tampering with, the concept of existence. In this paper I intend to approach Saint Anselm’s reasoning from a somewhat different angle.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Richard James Campbell (1976). From Belief to Understanding: A Study of Anselm's Proslogion Argument on the Existence of God. Faculty of Arts, Australian National University.
John R. Fortin (2006). The Naming of Father and Son in Saint Anselm's Monologion 38–42. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):161-170.
Anselm (1965). St. Anselm's Proslogion. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Anselm (1979). St. Anselm's Proslogion with a Reply on Behalf of the Fool. University of Notre Dame Press.
Mark Owen Webb (2005). In Defense of Anselm. Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Karl Barth (1960/1985). Anselm, Fides Quaerens Intellectum: Anselm's Proof of the Existence of God in the Context of His Theological Scheme. Pickwick Press.
Ian Logan (2008). Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Thomas Williams, Saint Anselm. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Michael J. O'Neill (2006). A Peculiar “Faith”: On R.G. Collingwood's Use of Saint Anselm's Argument. Saint Anselm Journal 3 (2):32-47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #33,011 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,228 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?