David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Poiesis and Praxis 3 (s 1-2):62-72 (2004)
Species are the basis of the taxonomic scheme. They are the lowest taxonomic category that are used as units for describing biodiversity and evolution. In this contribution we discuss the current species concept for prokaryotes. Such organisms are considered to represent the widest diversity among living organisms. Species is currently circumscribed as follows: A prokaryotic species is a category that circumscribes a (preferably) genomically coherent group of individual isolates/strains sharing a high degree of similarity in (many) independent features, comparatively tested under highly standardized conditions. Although the number of described prokaryotic species is underrepresented in the living world, this phylo-phenetic or polythetic species concept currently in use is considered to be pragmatic, operational and universally applicable and successfully used for identification processes.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter H. A. Sneath & Robert R. Sokal (1973). Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W. H. Freeman and Co..
M. Goodfellow, G. P. Manfio & J. Chun (1997). Towards A Practical Species Concept for Cultivable Bacteria. In M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah & M. R. Wilson (eds.), Species: The Units of Biodiversity. Chapman & Hall 25-59.
M. H. V. Van Regenmortel (1997). Viral Species. In M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah & M. R. Wilson (eds.), Species: The Units of Biodiversity. Chapman & Hall 17-24.
R. L. Mayden (1997). A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem. In M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah & M. R. Wilson (eds.), Species: The units of diversity,. Chapman and Hall 381–423.
Citations of this work BETA
Maureen A. O’Malley & John Dupré (2007). Size Doesn't Matter: Towards a More Inclusive Philosophy of Biology. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 22 (2):155-191.
Similar books and articles
Joel D. Velasco (2009). When Monophyly is Not Enough: Exclusivity as the Key to Defining a Phylogenetic Species Concept. Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):473-486.
Marc Ereshefsky (2010). Microbiology and the Species Problem. Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):553-568.
Marc Ereshefsky (2010). Darwin's Solution to the Species Problem. Synthese 175 (3):405 - 425.
Julio A. Camargo (2008). Revisiting the Relation Between Species Diversity and Information Theory. Acta Biotheoretica 56 (4):275-283.
Ernst Mayr (1996). What is a Species, and What is Not? Philosophy of Science 63 (2):262-277.
Ingo Brigandt (2003). Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1305–1316.
Mark Ridley (1989). The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem. Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
Hugh Lehman (1967). Are Biological Species Real? Philosophy of Science 34 (2):157-167.
C. Ricotta & G. C. Avena (2003). An Information-Theoretical Measure of Taxonomic Diversity. Acta Biotheoretica 51 (1):35-41.
P. Kämpfer & R. Rosselló-Mora (2004). The Species Concept for Prokaryotic Microorganisms?An Obstacle for Describing Diversity? Poiesis and Praxis 3 (1-2):62-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #293,832 of 1,781,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #295,005 of 1,781,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?