Against Theory 2: Hermeneutics and Deconstruction

Critical Inquiry 14 (1):49-68 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Against Theory” we argued that a text means what its author intends it to mean. We argued further that all attempts to found a method of interpretation on a general account of language involve imagining that a text can mean something other than what its author intends. Therefore, we concluded, all such attempts are bound to fail; there can be no method of interpretation. But the attempt to imagine that a text can mean something other than what its author intends is not restricted to writers interested in interpretive method. In fact, the denial that meaning is determined by intention is central to projects as indifferent to method as hermeneutics and deconstruction. For hermeneutics, a text means that its author intends but also necessarily means more, acquiring new meanings as readers apply it to new situations. For deconstruction, an author can never succeed in determining the meaning of a text; every text participates in a code that necessarily eludes authorial control. Since both these projects are committed to the view that a text from mean something other than what its author intends, they are also committed to the view that a text derives its identity from something other than authorial intention. The text is what it is, no matter what meaning is assigned to it by its author and no matter how that meaning is revised by its readers.What gives a text its autonomous identity? On most accounts, the answer is linguistic conventions—the semantic and syntactic rules of the language in which the text is written. One of our aims in the present essay is to criticize the particular notions of textual identity advanced by hermeneutics and deconstruction, but our more general target is the notion that there can be any plausible criteria of textual identity that can function independent of authorial intention. Because there can be no such criteria, nonmethodological versions of interpretive theory are as incoherent as methodological ones and, like the methodological ones, should be abandoned. Steven Knapp is associate professor of English at the University of California, Berkeley, and is the author of Personification and the Sublime: Milton to Coleridge. Walter Benn Michaels, professor of English at the University of California, Berkeley, is the author of The Gold Standard and the Logic of Naturalism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Specters of Nietzsche.Rodolphe Gasché - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 8:183-193.
Hermeneutics & deconstruction.Hugh J. Silverman & Don Ihde (eds.) - 1985 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
The very idea of radical hermeneutics.Roy Martinez (ed.) - 1997 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Hermeneutics and the Meaning of Life: A Critique of Gadamer's Interpretation of Dilthey.Frithjof Rodi - 1985 - In Hugh J. Silverman & Don Ihde (eds.), Hermeneutics & Deconstruction. State University of New York Press.
Hermeneutics of the World.Michael Murray - 1985 - In Hugh J. Silverman & Don Ihde (eds.), Hermeneutics & Deconstruction. State University of New York Press. pp. 91--105.
Against Theory.Steven Knapp & Walter Benn Michaels - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):723-742.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
53 (#267,003)

6 months
3 (#439,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Feminist Literary Criticism and the Author.Cheryl Walker - 1990 - Critical Inquiry 16 (3):551-571.
Getting into Mischief: On What it Means to Appeal to the U.S. Constitution.Daniel Frost - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (2):267-287.
The intentionalist controversy and cognitive science.Raymond W. Gibbs - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):181-205.
The Author of Common Law Texts.Arthur Glass - 1995 - Ratio Juris 8 (1):91-103.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references