Domains of applicability of social-scientific theories: Problems in the empirical falsifiability of bounded generalizations
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 14 (1):25–41 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesR. G. Swinburne (1964). Falsifiability of Scientific Theories. Mind 73 (291):434-436.
David N. Stamos (2007). Popper, Laws, and the Exclusion of Biology From Genuine Science. Acta Biotheoretica 55 (4).
Mark Steiner (1995). The Applicabilities of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):129-156.
C. Ulises Moulines (2006). Ontology, Reduction, Emergence: A General Frame. Synthese 151 (3):313-323.
David N. Stamos (1996). Popper, Falsifiability, and Evolutionary Biology. Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Kile Jones (2010). Falsifiability and Traction in Theories of Divine Action. Zygon 45 (3):575-589.
Noretta Koertge (1975). Popper's Metaphysical Research Program for the Human Sciences. Inquiry 18 (4):437 – 462.
Mario Bunge (1960). The Place of Induction in Science. Philosophy of Science 27 (3):262-270.
Davide Rizza (2010). Mathematical Nominalism and Measurement. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (1):53-73.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #234,650 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
