David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1):131-150 (2004)
Over the years I have written a number of articles critiquing Transcendental Thomism both from philosophical and from textual points of view. In the course of these articles, I have made comments on Bernard J. F. Lonergan’s epistemology. These comments have caught the eye of Jeremy D. Wilkins, and have provoked his article, “A Dialectic of ‘Thomist’ Realisms: John Knasas and Bernard Lonergan.” The violence of Wilkins’s reaction leads me to believe that despite the passing nature of my comments, they are sufficiently incisive to have cut a nerve. Nevertheless, it is my opinion that no reader of Wilkins would come away with any accurate grasp of my understanding of Lonergan, my reasons for it, and the precise point of contention between us. So, both for the record and the benefit of calm discussion of this influential figure, I would like to provide my hermeneutic of Lonergan and to pinpoint my trouble with him. To this end, I will repeat some descriptions of Lonergan from a recently published monograph, Being and Some Twentieth-Century Thomists (New York: Fordham University Press, 2003), and then address the criticisms of Wilkins
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeremy D. Wilkins (2004). A Dialectic of “Thomist” Realisms. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1):107-130.
Samuel B. Condic (2005). How a Priori Is Lonergan? Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:103-116.
Roland Teske (1990). Bradley and Lonergan's Relativist. Philosophy and Theology 5 (2):125-136.
Tad Dunne, Bernard Lonergan. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Patrick H. Byrne (2002). Lonergan's Retrieval of Aristotelian Form. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):371-392.
Patrick H. Byrne (2007). The Goodness of Being in Lonergan's Insight. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):43-72.
William F. J. Ryan (1973). Intentionality in Edmund Husserl and Bernard Lonergan. International Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):173-190.
Cyril Orji (2013). Using 'Foundation'as Inculturation Hermeneutic in a World Church: Did Rahner Validate Lonergan? Heythrop Journal 54 (2):287-300.
John C. Haughey (2011). The Charism of Bernard Lonergan. The Lonergan Review 3 (1):13-32.
Paul Symington (2006). The Unconscious and Conscious Self: The Nature of Psychical Unity in Freud and Lonergan. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):563-580.
John F. X. Knasas (2003). Being and Some Twentieth-Century Thomists. Fordham University Press.
Fred Lawrence (2009). Lonergan's Retrieval of Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Imago Dei. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3):363-388.
Bernard Lonergan (2011). Letter to Jane Collier. The Lonergan Review 3 (1):191-195.
Patrick Riordan (2010). Transforming Conflict Through Insight. By Kenneth R. Melchin and Cheryl A. Picard and Love and Objectivity in Virtue Ethics: Aristotle, Lonergan, and Nussbaum on Emotions and Moral Insight. By Robert J. Fitterer and The Relevance of Bernard Lonergan's Notion of Self-Appropriation to a Mystical-Political Theology. By Ian B. Bell and The Subjective Dimension of Human Work: The Conversion of the Acting Person According to Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and Bernard Lonergan. By Deborah Savage. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 51 (2):356-359.
Giovanni B. Sala (1997). Bernard Lonergan's Method in Theology. Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):469-499.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads15 ( #101,240 of 1,096,213 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #218,857 of 1,096,213 )
How can I increase my downloads?