A deflationist theory of intentionality? Brandom's analysis of de re specifying attitude-ascriptions
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):73-90 (2005)
The paper presents an interpretation of Brandom¿s analysis of de re specifying attitude-ascriptions. According to this interpretation, his analysis amounts to a deflationist conception of intentionality. In the first section I sketch the specific role deflationist theories of truth play within the philosophical debate on truth. Then I describe some analogies between the contemporary constellation of competing truth theories and the current confrontation of controversial theories of intentionality. The second section gives a short summary of Brandom¿s analysis of attitude-ascription, focusing on his account of the grammar of de re ascriptions of belief. The third section discusses in detail those aspects of his account from which a deflationist conception of intentionality may be derived, or which at least permit such a conception. In the proposed interpretation of Brandom¿s analysis, the vocabulary expressing the representational directedness of thought and talk does not describe a genuine property of mental states, but has an alternative descriptive function and in addition contains a performative and a metadescriptive element
|Keywords||Attitude Belief Deflationism Intentionality Language Brandom, Robert B|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven Hendley (2010). Answerable to the World: Experience and Practical Intentionality in Brandom's and McDowell's "Intramural" Debate. Theoria 76 (2):129-151.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1952). Intentionality and the Theory of Signs. Philosophical Studies 3 (June):56-63.
Kevin Scharp (2005). Scorekeeping in a Defective Language Game. Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):203-226.
David Lauer (2009). Genuine Normativity, Expressive Bootstrapping, and Normative Phenomenalism. Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1):321-350.
Daniel Laurier (2001). Non-Conceptually Contentful Attitudes in Interpretation. Sorites 13 (October):6-22.
Mark McCullagh (2005). Motivating Inferentialism. Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (1):77-84.
Gideon Rosen (2001). Brandom on Modality, Normativity, and Intentionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):611-23.
Heath White (2003). Brandom on Practical Reason. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):566–572.
Ruth G. Millikan (2005). The Father, the Son, and the Daughter: Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan. Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):59-71.
Carlo Penco (2005). Keeping Track of Individuals: Brandom's Analysis of Kripke's Puzzle and the Content of Belief. Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):177-201.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #281,668 of 1,096,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #102,815 of 1,096,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?