Ineffability investigations: What the later Wittgenstein has to offer to the study of ineffability [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):65 - 76 (2009)
While a considerable amount of effort has been expended in an attempt to understand Ludwig Wittgenstein’s enigmatic comments about silence and the mystical at the end of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , very little attention has been paid to the implications of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations for the study of ineffability. This paper first argues that, since Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations problematizes private language, emphasizes the description of actual language use, and recognizes the rule-governed nature of language, it contains significant implications for the study of ineffability, inviting investigations of the ways in which putative ineffability actually gets expressed rather than speculation about whether there are ineffable objects or experiences. It then undertakes such an investigation in the Dionysian corpus, finding therein not only grammatical techniques that express inexpressibility at the referential, illocutionary, and semiotic levels but also rules that underlie and govern these techniques. Finally, it shows how a recovery of the ordinary uses of ineffability might help dissolve the metaphysical problem of ineffability, thereby bringing ineffability back to the everyday.
|Keywords||Ludwig Wittgenstein Pseudo-Dionysius (Dionysius the Areopagite) Ineffability Mysticism Religious language Religious experience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Hume (2007/2006). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophical Review. Blackwell Pub. Ltd.. 338-339.
George Lakoff (1980/2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
John R. Searle (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
John Searle & Daniel Vanderveken (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock (2007). The Good Sense of Nonsense: A Reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus as Nonself-Repudiating. Philosophy 82 (1):147-177.
John Hick (2000). Ineffability. Religious Studies 36 (1):35-46.
Richard M. Gale (2006). The Problem of Ineffability in Dewey's Theory of Inquiry. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):75-90.
A. W. Moore (2003). Ineffability and Nonsense. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):169–193.
Peter Sullivan (2003). Ineffability and Nonsense. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):195–223.
Rafael De Clercq (2000). Aesthetic Ineffability. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (8-9):87-97.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #48,524 of 1,679,344 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #112,124 of 1,679,344 )
How can I increase my downloads?