David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (4):482-498 (2009)
Contemporary discussions of egalitarian justice have often focused on the issue of expensive taste. G.A. Cohen has recently abandoned the view that all chosen disadvantages are non-compensable, now maintaining that chosen expensive judgmental tastes—those endorsed by valuational judgment—are compensable as it is unreasonable to expect persons not to develop them. But chosen expensive brute taste—the main type of non-compensable expensive taste on the new scheme—cannot be described in such a way that there is a normative difference between it and chosen expensive judgmental taste. As there are related problems with denying compensation for the other kind of expensive taste that might remain non-compensable, Cohen's position on taste appears to be either implausible or virtually indistinguishable from that of equality of welfare. However, compensation for valuational judgment-based expensive taste might be justified on grounds of responsibility.
|Keywords||EQUALITY EXPENSIVE TASTE RESPONSIBILITY G.A. COHEN CHOICE JUSTICE|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Carl Knight (2013). Luck Egalitarianism. Philosophy Compass 8 (10):924-934.
Muhammad Velji (2015). Change Your Look, Change Your Luck: Religious Self-Transformation and Brute Luck Egalitarianism. Res Philosophica 92 (2):453-471.
Similar books and articles
Rasmus Sommer Hansen & Søren Flinch Midtgaard (2011). Sinking Cohen's Flagship — or Why People with Expensive Tastes Should Not Be Compensated. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):341-354.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2003). Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste". Inquiry 46 (2):143 – 163.
Michael Otsuka (2010). Justice as Fairness: Luck Egalitarian, Not Rawlsian. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 14 (3-4):217-230.
Kevin Melchionne, Acquired Taste. Contemporary Aesthetics.
G. A. Cohen (2004). Expensive Taste Rides Again. In Ronald Dworkin & Justine Burley (eds.), Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies by Dworkin. Blackwell Pub.
G. Anthony Bruno (2009). Aesthetic Value, Intersubjectivity and the Absolute Conception of the World. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 6 (3).
Henry E. Allison (2001). Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Watkins (2011). The Subjective Basis of Kant's Judgment of Taste. Inquiry 54 (4):315-336.
Hye-Jin Lee (2008). Eine andere Art von Gefühl der Lust beim Kantischen Geschmacksurteil. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:283-291.
Elisabeth Schellekens (2009). Taste and Objectivity: The Emergence of the Concept of the Aesthetic. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743.
Theodore A. Gracyk (1990). Are Kant's “Aesthetic Judgment” and “Judgment of Taste” Synonymous? International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (2):159-172.
Melissa Zinkin (2012). Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”. Inquiry 55 (5):433-453.
Michael J. Shaffer (2007). Taste, Gastronomic Expertise and Objectivity. In Fritz Allhoff & David Monroe (eds.), Food & Philosophy. Blackwell
Simon Keller (2002). Expensive Tastes and Distributive Justice. Social Theory and Practice 28 (4):529-552.
Theodore Gracyk (2011). Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads136 ( #29,366 of 1,934,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #52,983 of 1,934,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?