David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 44 (3):533-542 (2009)
Although naturalistic perspectives are an important component of their accounts of divine action, most participants in the current dialogue between science and theology eschew a purely naturalistic model. They believe that certain events of divine providence require a special mode of divine action, over and above that inherent in naturalistic processes. The analogy of human providential action suggests, however, that a strong theistic naturalism can account for these events. This model does not depend on a particular notion of God's relationship to time and is not inherently implausible from a scientific perspective. Although it can be interpreted deistically, the model also is consonant with a nondeistic theology that may be described as involving a pansacramental or incarnational naturalism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philip Clayton (2000). On the Value of the Panentheistic Analogy: A Response to Willem Drees. Zygon 35 (3):699-704.
Willem B. Drees (1996). Religion, Science, and Naturalism. Cambridge University Press.
Willem B. Drees (2000). Thick Naturalism: Comments on Zygon 2000. Zygon 35 (4):849-860.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vance G. Morgan (1998). Cognitive Science, Naturalism, and Divine Prototypes. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):25-46.
Seymour Feldman (2010). Gersonides: Judaism Within the Limits of Reason. Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
Kile Jones (2010). Falsifiability and Traction in Theories of Divine Action. Zygon 45 (3):575-589.
Christopher J. Kosciuk, Human Freedom in a World Full of Providence: An Ockhamist-Molinist Account of the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Creaturely Free Will.
John F. Haught (2010). Is Physics Fundamental? Robert Russell on Divine Action. Zygon 45 (1):213-220.
F. LeRon Shults, Nancey C. Murphy & Robert J. Russell (eds.) (2009). Philosophy, Science and Divine Action. Brill.
Morgan Luck (2010). On Polkinghorne's Unification of General Providence, Special Providence and Miracle. Sophia 49 (4):577-589.
Added to index2009-08-27
Total downloads41 ( #40,516 of 1,098,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #175,054 of 1,098,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?