David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 23 (6):797-820 (2010)
Are all norms cognized in the same way? I present experimental evidence suggesting that they are not. I propose a distinction between two main classes of violations—the victimful and the victimless—and show that while people tend to rate acts belonging to either category as impermissible, the justifications for their judgments refer to salient features of the act only in the former case. I further show that Feinberg's distinction between harmful and offensive acts is useful in discriminating between different types of victimful violations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Shaun Nichols (2004). Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. Oxford University Press.
Elliot Turiel (1983). The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge University Press.
Joel Feinberg (1984). The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Raymond Geuss (2001). Public Goods, Private Goods. Princeton University Press.
Robin L. Nabi (2002). The Theoretical Versus the Lay Meaning of Disgust: Implications for Emotion Research. Cognition and Emotion 16 (5):695-703.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Declan Smithies (2012). The Normative Role of Knowledge. Noûs 46 (2):265-288.
Alexandra Plakias (2013). The Good and the Gross. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):261-278.
Samia Hurst (2010). What 'Empirical Turn in Bioethics'? Bioethics 24 (8):439-444.
Heidi Maibom (2010). What Experimental Evidence Shows Us About the Role of Emotions in Moral Judgement. Philosophy Compass 5 (11):999-1012.
Dale Spencer (2011). Event and Victimization. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):39-52.
Jeanette Kennett & Cordelia Fine (2009). Will the Real Moral Judgment Please Stand Up? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (1):77–96.
Kristoffer Ahlstrom (2008). Epistemology and Empirical Investigation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):109-134.
John Whittaker (2010). The Logic of Authoritative Revelations. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):167-181.
Laurence BonJour (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Harvard University Press.
Wayne Christensen & John Sutton (2012). Reflections on Emotions, Imagination, and Moral Reasoning Toward an Integrated, Multidisciplinary Approach to Moral Cognition. In Robyn Langdon & Catriona Mackenzie (eds.), Emotions, Imagination, and Moral Reasoning. Psychology Press 327-347.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Epistemic Justification. Oxford University Press.
Richard Schantz (1999). The Role of Sensory Experience in Epistemic Justification: A Problem for Coherentism. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):177-191.
Joseph DesJardins (2004). Explanation and Justification. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:239-261.
Oliver Rauprich (2008). Common Morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):43-71.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads8 ( #366,937 of 1,789,735 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,735 )
How can I increase my downloads?