Unit-ideas Unleashed: A Reinterpretation and Reassessment of Lovejovian Methodology in the History of Ideas
Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (2):195-217 (2012)
|Abstract||This article argues for an unconventional interpretation of Arthur O. Lovejoy’s distinctive approach to method in the history of ideas. It is maintained that the value of the central concept of the ‘unit-idea’ has been misunderstood by friends and foes alike. The commonality of unit-ideas at different times and places is often defined in terms of familial resemblance. But such an approach must necessarily define unit-ideas as being something other than the smallest conceptual unit. It is therefore in tension with Lovejoy’s methodological prescription and, more importantly, disregards a potentially important aspect of intellectual history – the smaller conceptual units themselves. In response to this, an alternative interpretation of unit-ideas as ‘elemental’ – as the smallest identifiable conceptual components – is put forward. Unlike the familial resemblance approach, the elemental approach can provide a plausible explanation for changes in ideas. These are construed as being either the creation of new unit-ideas, the disappearance of existing ones, or alterations in the groups of unit-ideas that compose idea-complexes. The focus on the movement of unit-ideas and idea-complexes through history can also be sensitive to contextual issues, carefully distinguishing the different meanings that single words may have, in much the way that both Lovejoy and his influential critic Quentin Skinner suggest.|
|Keywords||Quentin Skinner causality context Arthur O. Lovejoy change|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher Woodard (2011). Rationality and the Unit of Action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):261-277.
David Trafimow (2012). The Concept of Unit Coherence and Its Application to Psychology Theories. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (2):131-154.
Anthony Burns (2011). Conceptual History and the Philosophy of the Later Wittgenstein: A Critique of Quentin Skinners Contextualist Method. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):54-83.
Leo Catana (2009). Lovejoy's Readings of Bruno: Or How Nineteenth-Century History of Philosophy Was "Transformed" Into the History of Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas 71 (1):91-112.
Harmon R. Holcomb Iii (1986). Causes, Ends, and the Units of Selection. Philosophy Research Archives 12:519-539.
H. V. Stopes-Roe (1967). The Discovery of Time: Third Volume in Series The Ancestry of Science (Nuffield Foundation Unit for the History of Ideas). By Stephen Toulmin and June Goodfield. (Hutchinson, London. 1965. Pp. 280. 35s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 42 (161):282-.
Eleas Jose Palti (2006). The Problem of "Misplaced Ideas" Revisited: Beyond the "History of Ideas" in Latin America. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (1):149-179.
Robert Boroch (2012). Theoretical Proposal of Hybrid Analysis of Lexical Unit: Light. In Edis - Publishing Institution of the University Of Zilina (ed.), Proceedings in Advanced Research in Scientific Areas. The 1st Virtual International Conference.
William H. Dray (1995). History as Re-Enactment: R.G. Collingwood's Idea of History. Oxford University Press.
Liane Gabora (2004). Ideas Are Not Replicators but Minds Are. Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):127-143.
Susan Hurley (2003). The Limits of Individualism Are Not the Limits of Rationality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):164-165.
Thomas F. Shipley (1998). Spatiotemporal Unit Formation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):772-772.
Added to index2012-09-10
Total downloads51 ( #24,385 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #4,631 of 722,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?