Graduate studies at Western
Political Theory 34 (5):594 - 623 (2006)
|Abstract||Much of the appeal of deliberative democracy lies in its emancipatory promise to give otherwise disadvantaged groups a voice, and to grant them influence through reasoned argument. However, the precise mechanisms for delivery of this promise remain obscure. After reviewing Habermas's formulation of deliberation, the article draws on recent theories of argumentation to provide a more detailed account of such mechanisms. The article identifies the key emancipatory mechanism as explicitness in language. It outlines the primary modalities of this mechanism: expressing differences of opinion, mobilising a shared standard of inference, and recognising and excluding fallacious appeals to irrelevant factors such as force or authority. It describes how these modalities are enhanced at a secondary, reflexive level that recognises the partiality and defeasibility of particular argumentative exchanges. Such qualifications, it is argued, support a model of deliberation across discourses that allows a clearer appreciation of its potential and limits.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John O'Neill (2002). The Rhetoric of Deliberation: Some Problems in Kantian Theories of Deliberative Democracy. Res Publica 8 (3):249-268.
Paul Nieuwenburg (2004). Learning to Deliberate: Aristotle on Truthfulness and Public Deliberation. Political Theory 32 (4):449-467.
Erik Schneiderhan & Shamus Khan (2008). Reasons and Inclusion: The Foundation of Deliberation. Sociological Theory 26 (1):1 - 24.
Bashir Bashir (2012). Reconciling Historical Injustices: Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (2):127-143.
Michele Dillon (1999). The Authority of the Holy Revisited: Habermas, Religion, and Emancipatory Possibilities. Sociological Theory 17 (3):290-306.
Stefan Rummens (2008). Deliberation Interrupted: Confronting Jürgen Habermas with Claude Lefort. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (4):383-408.
Lee Kerckhove (1995). Emancipatory Social Science and Genealogy. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (1):19-26.
Jennifer M. Morton (2011). Toward an Ecological Theory of the Norms of Practical Deliberation. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):561-584.
James Bohman (2003). Reflexive Public Deliberation: Democracy and the Limits of Pluralism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (1):85-105.
Richard Bradley (2007). Consensus by Aggregation and Deliberation. In Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen (ed.), Homage à Wlodek: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz.
Joshua W. Houston (2009). Contestation and Deliberation Within. Social Philosophy Today 25:241-253.
Denise Vitale (2006). Between Deliberative and Participatory Democracy: A Contribution on Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):739-766.
Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij (2012). Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable. Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3).
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads9 ( #122,488 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?