Graduate studies at Western
Vivarium 48 (1-2):75-95 (2010)
|Abstract||This article considers three medieval approaches to the problem of future contingent propositions in chapter 9 of Aristotle's De Interpretatione . While Boethius assumed that God's atemporal knowledge infallibly pertains to historical events, he was inclined to believe that Aristotle correctly taught that future contingent propositions are not antecedently true or false, even though they may be characterized as true-or-false. Aquinas also tried to combine the allegedly Aristotelian view of the disjunctive truth-value of future contingent propositions with the conception of all things being timelessly present to God's knowledge. The second approach was formulated by Peter Abelard who argued that in Aristotle's view future contingent propositions are true or false, not merely true-or-false, and that the antecedent truth of future propositions does not necessitate things in the world. After Duns Scotus, many late medieval thinkers thought like Abelard, particularly because of their new interpretation of contingency, but they did not believe, with the exception of John Buridan, that this was an Aristotelian view|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lennart Åqvist (2003). Future Contingents and Determinism in Aristotle's De Interpretatione IX: Some Logical Aspects of the So-Called Second Oldest Interpretation. Logique Et Analyse 46 (181):13-48.
Berit Brogaard (2008). Sea Battle Semantics. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):326–335.
Michael Perloff & Nuel Belnap (2011). Future Contingents and the Battle Tomorrow. The Review of Metaphysics 64 (3):581-602.
Alan R. Rhoda (2010). Probability, Truth, and the Openness of the Future. Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):197-204.
Jaakko Hintikka (1964). The Once and Future Sea Fight: Aristotle's Discussion of Future Contingents in de Interpretatione IX. Philosophical Review 73 (4):461-492.
Sven Rosenkranz (2012). In Defence of Ockhamism. Philosophia 40 (3):617-631.
Jonathan Evans (2004). Boethius on Modality and Future Contingents. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):247-271.
Ezio Di Nucci (2012). Knowing Future Contingents. Logos and Episteme 3 (1):43-50.
Michael J. Cholbi (2003). Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads48 ( #26,837 of 756,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,433 of 756,891 )
How can I increase my downloads?