Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (3):349-374 (2009)
|Abstract||Transnational corporations have become actors with significant political power and authority which should entail responsibility and liability, specifically direct liability for complicity in human rights violations. Holding TNCs liable for human rights violations is complicated by the discontinuity between the fragmented legal/political structure of the TNC and its integrated strategic reality and the international state system which privileges sovereignty and non-intervention over the protection of individual rights. However, the post-Westphalian transition—the emergence of multiple authorities, increasing ambiguity of borders and jurisdiction and blurring of the line between the public and private spheres—should facilitate imposing direct responsibility on transnational firms. Mechanisms for imposing direct responsibility on TNCs are considered including voluntary agreements and international law. However, I conclude that a hybrid public-private regime which relies onnon-hierarchical compliance mechanisms is likely to be both more effective and consistent with the structure of the emerging transnational order|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Denis G. Arnold (2010). Transnational Corporations and the Duty to Respect Basic Human Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):371-399.
Aukje A. H. Van Hoek, Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Issues with Regard to the Liability of European Corporations for Labour Law Infringements in the Countries of Establishment of Their Suppliers.
Dorothée Baumann (2006). Global Rules and Private Actors. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):505-532.
Andreas Georg Scherer, Guido Palazzo & Dorotheé Baumann (2006). Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):505-532.
Serena Parekh (2011). Getting to the Root of Gender Inequality: Structural Injustice and Political Responsibility. Hypatia 26 (4):672-689.
Michael A. Santoro (2010). Post-Westphalia and Its Discontents. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):285-297.
James Turner Johnson (2013). Religion, Violence, and Human Rights. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):1-14.
Baris Parkan (2009). On Multinational Corporations and the Provision of Positive Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 85:73 - 82.
Sean D. Murphy (2013). Jus Ad Bellum, Values, and the Contemporary Structure of International Law. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):20-26.
Maurizio Passerin D'Entrèves & Ursula Vogel (eds.) (2000). Public and Private: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge.
Justine Nolan & Luke Taylor (2009). Corporate Responsibility for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Rights in Search of a Remedy? Journal of Business Ethics 87:433 - 451.
Florian Wettstein (2010). For Better or For Worse. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):275-283.
Marguerite Schneider & Alix Valenti (2008). The Effects of “Going Private” on Corporate Financial and Corporate Social Performance. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:236-245.
Bartosz W. Wojdynski & Daniel Riffe (2011). What Kind of Media, and When? Public Opinion About Press Coverage of Politicians' Private Lives. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (3):206 - 223.
William C. Frederick (1991). The Moral Authority of Transnational Corporate Codes. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (3):165 - 177.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 549,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?