David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):130-139 (2011)
There are in two assumptions inherent in this issue's theme, both inimical to the traditional goals of medicine and to the standards of care it proposed. First, the idea that treatment must be limited for some (but not others) on the basis of cost was born in the early literature of bioethics. Second, that there is a quantifiable and diagnostically predictable period at the “end-of-life” where treatment is “futile,” and therefore not worth supporting in a context of scarcity grew out of bioethics's construction of allocative protocols in the 1990s. This paper traces the history of these ideas as constructs grounded in neither natural scarcity nor in firm diagnostic categories. Their relation to issues of care is therefore suspect
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bruce Jennings (2009). Public Health and Liberty: Beyond the Millian Paradigm. Public Health Ethics 2 (2):123-134.
Daniel Callahan & Norman Daniels (1989). Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society. Ethics 100 (1):169-176.
Anson Rabinbach (1992). The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue, and the Origins of Modernity. University of California Press.
J. Harris (1987). QALYfying the Value of Life. Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (3):117-123.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary Ann Baily (2011). Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):172-182.
John D. Lantos & William L. Meadow (2011). Costs and End-of-Life Care in the NICU: Lessons for the MICU? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):194-200.
H. ten Have & David Clark (eds.) (2002). The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspectives. Open University Press.
Lars Bernfort (2003). Decisions on Inclusion in the Swedish Basic Health Care Package—Roles of Cost-Effectiveness and Need. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):301-308.
David F. Kelly (2004). Contemporary Catholic Health Care Ethics. Georgetown University Press.
E. Haavi Morreim (1989). Stratified Scarcity: Redefining the Standard of Care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 17 (4):356-367.
L. J. Schneiderman (1995). Wrong Medicine: Doctors, Patients, and Futile Treatment. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dominic Wilkinson & Julian Savulescu (2014). A Costly Separation Between Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment in Intensive Care. Bioethics 28 (3):127-137.
Michael Ashby (2011). The Futility of Futility: Death Causation is the 'Elephant in the Room' in Discussions About Limitation of Medical Treatment. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):151-154.
Dan Crippen & Amber E. Barnato (2011). The Ethical Implications of Health Spending: Death and Other Expensive Conditions. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):121-129.
Kjell Arne Johansson & Ole Frithjof Norheim (2011). Problems With Prioritization: Exploring Ethical Solutions to Inequalities in HIV Care. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):32-40.
Sharona Hoffman & Andy Podgurski (2011). Improving Health Care Outcomes Through Personalized Comparisons of Treatment Effectiveness Based on Electronic Health Records. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):425-436.
E. Fenton (2010). Making Fair Funding Decisions for High Cost Cancer Care: The Case of Herceptin in New Zealand. Public Health Ethics 3 (2):137-146.
Fiona Randall (1996). Palliative Care Ethics: A Good Companion. Oxford University Press.
Gordon Graham (1987). The Doctor, the Rich, and the Indigent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):51-61.
Added to index2011-05-12
Total downloads15 ( #175,574 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?